My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-0917 Special City Commission Meeting - 1st Budget Hrg
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-0917 Special City Commission Meeting - 1st Budget Hrg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2013 3:42:23 PM
Creation date
10/24/2013 3:42:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
1st Budget Hearing
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
09/17/2013
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary Minutes:Special City Commission Meeting September 17,2013 Sunny Isles Beach,Florida <br /> First Budget Hearing <br /> Mayor Edelcup said all we want to make sure is whatever we finally do meets the Ethics <br /> requirements and so he will leave it with the City Manager and City Attorney to work out the <br /> specifics. Either way when you reach your conclusion, she will be hired as either a Consultant <br /> or as an employee depending upon how everything plays itself out. <br /> Commissioner Scholl said he doesn't even know why the Commission is getting involved in <br /> this because the bottom line is we agree that this is what we wanted,whatever this mechanism <br /> is, to potentially get grants for us in the future, etc. He doesn't agree with what the City <br /> Attorney just said because he read Joe Centorino's letter and he just doesn't agree with the <br /> City Attorney's interpretation. We have money appropriated in the budget and it is up to the <br /> City Manager to prosecute the mechanism of how that is going to come about. Mayor <br /> Edelcup said the money is being provided for and the City Manager makes the decision. We <br /> don't normally make the decisions as to whether or not people are hired as employees or <br /> contracted since that is something that the City Manager usually handles. <br /> Vice Mayor Aelion said with that being said,cities have a City Attorney for a purpose and this <br /> is to guide the City in its legal affairs, and if a City Attorney has an opinion about a certain <br /> issue, not only do they have to be heard, they have to be weighed and weighed seriously. <br /> Mayor Edelcup said there is a difference of opinion here. Each one of us has read all the <br /> opinions that have been sent to us, and we do not all necessarily agree with our City <br /> Attorney's decision. Based on that he is asking the City Manager and the City Attorney,who <br /> should be the people that are working this out and not the Commission,to make sure however <br /> this person is hired conforms to any ethics requirements that are there, and that they both be <br /> satisfied in the end that we are doing the right thing and report back to the Commission. But <br /> he thinks the Commission should not be stepping into this segment of how people are hired <br /> within the City's organization. Commissioner Levin said she thinks there are special <br /> circumstances here, she did not ask for the item to be removed from the budget,she asked that <br /> it be reclassified. She would like to see either a complete job description or a Scope of <br /> Services to justify the amount of money that will ultimately be paid, and Vice Mayor Aelion <br /> agreed. <br /> City Attorney Ottinot clarified for the record that his opinion is basically consistent with the <br /> Ethics Commission, and Mayor Edelcup disagreed. City Attorney Ottinot said when he <br /> received the letter from the State Commission and the County, he called Mr. Centorino and <br /> Ms. Frigo and asked them to explain paragraph 3 in the opinion a person can be hired as an <br /> employee if he or she basically terminates an employment, and in the bottom paragraph they <br /> indicated that person cannot be representing a developer outside the community if he or she <br /> believes the developer has an item before the City. I called him and asked him to clarify that <br /> because there is clearly a conflict here. The City Manager came to him yesterday with an <br /> issue of a part-time employee who has been asked by a developer to work outside the City. <br /> The City Manager asked him to call the employee and both of us agreed that the employee had <br /> a choice to either become a Consultant and work with anyone he wants to or a City employee <br /> and he decided to stay with the City and not to have that conflict. And so we had a similar <br /> issue yesterday and the City Manager did not disagree with that. <br /> Mayor Edelcup said he has read the opinions and he does not get the same interpretation after <br /> reading Joe Centorino's memo that the City Attorney interprets it to be. We are talking about <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.