Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Sunny Isles Beach | RFP Bella Vista Park Dock Reconstruction 19-07-01 39 <br /> <br />contract must set a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Further, the non-Federal <br />entity awarding such a contract must assert a high degree of oversight in order to obtain reasonable <br />assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. <br />(k) The non-Federal entity alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice <br />and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out <br />of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and <br />claims. These standards do not relieve the non-Federal entity of any contractual responsibilities under <br />its contracts. The Federal awarding agency will not substitute its judgment for that of the non-Federal <br />entity unless the matter is primarily a Federal concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, <br />state, or Federal authority having proper jurisdiction. <br /> <br />[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 43309, July 22, 2015] <br /> <br />§200.319 Competition. <br /> <br />(a) All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition <br />consistent with the standards of this section. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and <br />eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, <br />statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing <br />for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include but <br />are not limited to: <br /> <br />(1) Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business; <br />(2) Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; <br />(3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; <br />(4) Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts; <br />(5) Organizational conflicts of interest; <br />(6) Specifying only a “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered and <br />describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and <br />(7) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process. <br />(b) The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily <br />or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or <br />proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage <br />geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for <br />architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided <br />its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, <br />to compete for the contract. <br />(c) The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These <br />procedures must ensure that all solicitations: <br />(1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, <br />or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features <br />which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of <br />the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum