envirowaste services group inc. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION S75.02G43 CONTRACTOR MAINTENANCE FIELD PERFORMANCE REPORT W14 Contractor: Envirowaste Services Group, Inc. Contract: E2V99 Evaluation Date: May 21, 2018 Type of Evaluation: 0 Periodic (j) Final Pursuit and Timely Completion of Work Performance The Contractor performed all work in an effective and expedient manner. The Department's Excellent expectations regarding timely pursuit and completion of the work were often exceeded. Except for a few occasions, the Contractor completed all of the work within authorized timeframes. The Satisfactory Contractor consistently demonstrated sufficient efforts to complete work in a timely fashion. The Satisfactory Department's expectations regarding timely pursuit and completion of the work were usually met and 0 sometimes exceeded. The Contractor occasionally completed the work in a timely manner, but efforts were consistently less Unsatisfactory than adequate. Department involvement was required on more than one occasion to prompt the O Contractor to complete the work, 0 The Contractor failed to complete the work in a timely fashion. On several occasions the Contractor Poor failed to begin work in a timely fashion, and the Contractor made little effort to correct deficiencies. Poor Substantial Department involvement was required to prompt completion of the work, including written 0 correspondence advising the Contractor of potential default. Expectations were not met. Notes & Comments The Contractor accomplished all work in an expedient manner as additional crews were utilized to ensure the job was completed in accordance with the contract. It was the expertise and organizational skills of the Contractor that made them realize extra personnel were needed The Department commended the Contractor for being self-sufficient and cognizant of the time frames in the contract. Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) & Safety Operations Performance MOT setups and compliance were proper with no correctable complaints from Department personnel and/or traveling public. No incidents or injuries occurred within work zones due to improper MOT. Excellent Qualified MOT personnel were present at all times. Expectations were exceeded, Contractor often went above and beyond FDOT Design Standard requirements to ensure safety for both work crews and travelin ublic. MOT setups and compliance were mostlyproper with few correctable complaints from Department and/or traveling No incidents or injuries to improper Satisfactory personnel public. occurred within work zones due 0 MOT. Qualified MOT personnel were present. Expectations were met and exceededoccasionally. MOT setups and compliance were at times achieved, but there were several complaints and/or Unsatisfactory incidents of non-compliance. No major incidents or injuries occurred within work zones due to improper MOT. Qualified MOT personnel were usually present. Some involvement from Department personnel 0 was required on a few occasions. Expectations were not consistently met. Proper MOT deployment and overall compliance was lacking. Numerous correctable complaints from Poor Department personnel and/or traveling public were noted. An incident with injuries may have occurred within the work zone due to improper MOT. Qualified MOT in 0 personnel were seldom on site or close proximity to the work site. Expectations were not met. N/A N/A (To be used when MOT was not necessary or included in the contract). 0 Notes & Comments No involvement was needed from the Department as all MOT setups were in compliance with the Design Standards. All lane closures were setup properly and the devices were in accordance with the Approved Product Ust (APL). No complaints were received from the traveling public as safety of the work zone was a major concern of the Contractor.