My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hardesty & Hanover, LLC
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(20-10-01) Professional Engineering and Architectural Services for Ped.
>
Responses
>
Hardesty & Hanover, LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2020 10:58:06 AM
Creation date
11/23/2020 10:53:21 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />STRUCTURES <br />The Bridge Development Report (BDR), performed during the Initial Engineering Phase, will <br />establish the basic parameters that will affect the work in the Final Engineering Phase. The BDR <br />will evaluate and compare various bridge elements for viability, durability, constructability, <br />maintainability, and cost. <br />Examples of BDR element comparisons include: <br />• Main Span Structural System Elements - <br />o Florida U-Beams (FUB) - FUBs are preferred choice from preliminary calculations and <br />design concepts and are featured in the narrative below <br />o Florida I-Beams (FIB) - FIBs introduce more elements to erect, more diaphragms to cast, <br />have less torsional capacity, and add visual clutter with the additional beam lines <br />beneath. <br />o Steel Box or I-girders - With the highly corrosive oceanfront environment, steel <br />superstructures need coating systems that require costly maintenance. Maintenance <br />and inspection activities are costly and disruptive to traffic along Collins Ave. <br />• Foundation Elements - <br />o Drilled Shafts - installation of shaft casings increase construction vibration risk to adjacent <br />high value properties <br />o Augercast piles - minimal installation vibration <br />The following discussion previews the BDR process and presents solutions resulting from our initial <br />screening of known project issues. Final recommendations will be documented for City and FDOT review <br />and commentary for approval prior to proceeding to Final Engineering phase. <br />Main Structural System <br />The structural system needs to meet the following requirements to satisfy the functionality and geometry <br />of the Bridge Park: <br />• Complex Irregular Plan Geometry - requires a superstructure system that can accommodate the <br />iconic vision without excessive cost or complicated details <br />• Grade Separated Park Areas - requires a superstructure cross section that can accommodate <br />different elevations without excessive structural depth <br />• Single Span - requires a superstructure system that spans the entire Collins Avenue corridor <br />We propose the use of a “spine and rib” system with a spine consisting of three redundant, Florida <br />U Beams (FUBs) and continuous transverse concrete ribs of varying lengths. The spine and rib <br />system provide key advantages including structural redundancy, weight efficiency, geometric <br />versatility, durability, constructability, inspection ease and low-cost relative to other systems <br />such as heavy segmental post-tensioned systems or high maintenance steel. <br />It is critical to provide a simple and redundant structural system to support the multifaceted <br />functionality. It is equally important to develop a structural sys tem that is safely constructible, <br />durable, inspectable, and maintainable to protect the City’s investment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.