My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2021-3182
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2021
>
Reso 2021-3182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2021 11:22:18 AM
Creation date
4/13/2021 11:01:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2021-3182
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
03/18/2021
Description
Ratifying First Amendments with DRC Emergency Services, LLC and Crowdergulf Joint Venture, Inc. for disaster debris removal services.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GATE: May &, 2018 ADDENDUM # 1 <br />TO: ALL PROPOSERS <br />FROM; Pur€haling Agent <br />RF1110,. 111 11-111-01 <br />TITLE: RFP 18-04-01• Disaster febris Management and Removal Services <br />SUBJECT: Addendum No. 1 <br />BID SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Thursday, May 10, 2018'at 2.30 PM <br />Please attach this addendum to the documents in your possession and include the Acknowledgement <br />of Addenda form with your response incorporated in the RFP. This addendum is and does become a <br />part of the Disaster Debris Management and Removal Services RFP. <br />Questions & Answers: <br />1- there is a significant cast difference and amount of labor required to grind C&D debris versus grinding <br />vegetative debris. Would the City consider adding a separate line item For reduction of C&D via grinding? <br />A. Yes, please add the line item for C&D grinding as line 3.35 part of Schedule 3 of the price proposal. <br />2. Would the City consider accepting compaction as an accepted form of rcducing C&D debris? A. Yes, <br />however any damage caused to the temp site by any compaction equipment or grinding equipment <br />for C&D must be repaired by the contractor. <br />3. Please explain specifically how the pricing of one proposal will be evaluated against the pricing from <br />another proposal, including the answer to these questions: <br />a. Will each pricing proposal be analyzed and refined to become orie total number which can there <br />be compared to the other proposals, and if so, what is the formu la that wil I be used to derive that <br />total number? A: Various price analysis methods may be utilized to determine the best value <br />among all proposers. <br />b- Will extended totals (unit price multiplied by estimated quantity) be used to evaluate pricing, <br />and if so, what estimated quantities and what line items will be used to derive the extended totals <br />that will be evaluated? A: The City may use several evaluation formulas i.e. based on total <br />amount of debris generated, mast used services, etc. <br />c. Will all pricing line items be evaluated equally or will some line items receive more importance <br />in the evaluation? A: Not necessarily. As mentioned before, various price analysis methods may <br />be utilized to determine the best value. <br />4. Is there an existing contract similar to this in place or previously in place? Are the bid tabulations <br />available? A. Attached is the City's previous contract for debris clearing and removal services. <br />5. Does the City have disposal rates for local C&D, Class 1 and Class 3 waste? A: Rates are determined at <br />the time of disposal and should be considered as a pass through cost. (As in, they pay up front and bill <br />us for actual with verified official dump tickets from the dump site. <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.