My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Marcum
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 22-02-01 Professional Independent Auditing Services
>
Responses
>
Marcum
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2022 12:13:22 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 9:48:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Your Success is Our Focus <br />319 McClanahan Street, S.W. • P.O. Box 12388 • Roanoke, VA 24025-2388 • 540-345-0936 • Fax: 540-342-6181 • www.BEcpas.com <br />Report on the Firm’s System of Quality Control <br />To the Partners of <br /> Marcum LLP <br /> and the National Peer Review Committee <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of <br />Marcum, LLP (the “firm”),applicable to engagements not subject to PCAOB permanent inspection, in <br />effect for the year ended April 30, 2020.Our peer review was conducted in accordance with the <br />Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Standards). <br />A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a <br />System Review as described in the Standards may be found at www.aicpa.org/prsummary. The <br />summary also includes an explanation of how engagements identified as not performed or reported in <br />conformity with applicable professional standards, if any, are evaluated by a peer reviewer to determine <br />a peer review rating. <br />Firm’s Responsibility <br />The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to <br />provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable <br />professional standards in all material respects. The firm is also responsible for evaluating actions to <br />promptly remediate engagements deemed as not performed or reported in conformity with professional <br />standards, when appropriate, and for remediating weaknesses in its system of quality control, if any. <br />Peer Reviewer's Responsibility <br />Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the <br />firm’s compliance therewith based on our review. <br />Required Selections and Considerations <br />Engagements selected for review included engagements performed under Government Auditing <br />Standards, including compliance audits under the Single Audit Act; audits of employee benefit plans, <br />audits performed under FDICIA,audits of broker-dealers,and examinations of service organizations <br />[SOC 1 and 2 engagements]. <br />As part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities as communicated by <br />the firm, if applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.