Laserfiche WebLink
Your Success is Our Focus <br />319 McClanahan Street, S.W. • P.O. Box 12388 • Roanoke, VA 24025-2388 • 540-345-0936 • Fax: 540-342-6181 • www.BEcpas.com <br />Report on the Firm’s System of Quality Control <br />To the Partners of <br /> Marcum LLP <br /> and the National Peer Review Committee <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of <br />Marcum, LLP (the “firm”),applicable to engagements not subject to PCAOB permanent inspection, in <br />effect for the year ended April 30, 2020.Our peer review was conducted in accordance with the <br />Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (Standards). <br />A summary of the nature, objectives, scope, limitations of, and the procedures performed in a <br />System Review as described in the Standards may be found at www.aicpa.org/prsummary. The <br />summary also includes an explanation of how engagements identified as not performed or reported in <br />conformity with applicable professional standards, if any, are evaluated by a peer reviewer to determine <br />a peer review rating. <br />Firm’s Responsibility <br />The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it to <br />provide the firm with reasonable assurance of performing and reporting in conformity with applicable <br />professional standards in all material respects. The firm is also responsible for evaluating actions to <br />promptly remediate engagements deemed as not performed or reported in conformity with professional <br />standards, when appropriate, and for remediating weaknesses in its system of quality control, if any. <br />Peer Reviewer's Responsibility <br />Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the <br />firm’s compliance therewith based on our review. <br />Required Selections and Considerations <br />Engagements selected for review included engagements performed under Government Auditing <br />Standards, including compliance audits under the Single Audit Act; audits of employee benefit plans, <br />audits performed under FDICIA,audits of broker-dealers,and examinations of service organizations <br />[SOC 1 and 2 engagements]. <br />As part of our peer review, we considered reviews by regulatory entities as communicated by <br />the firm, if applicable, in determining the nature and extent of our procedures.