My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Marcum
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 22-02-01 Professional Independent Auditing Services
>
Responses
>
Marcum
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2022 12:13:22 PM
Creation date
3/8/2022 9:48:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Deerfield Beach, Florida <br />June 30, 2021 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Disagreements with Management <br /> <br />For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or <br />auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial <br />statements or the auditors’ report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during <br />the course of our audit. <br /> <br />Management Representations <br /> <br />We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management <br />representation letter dated June 30, 2021. <br /> <br />Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants <br /> <br />In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and <br />accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation <br />involves application of an accounting principle to City’s financial statements or a determination of <br />the type of auditors’ opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards <br />require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant <br />facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. <br /> <br />Other Audit Findings or Issues <br /> <br />We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and <br />auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as City’s auditors. However, these <br />discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not <br />a condition to our retention. <br /> <br />The Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs which includes our audit findings and Appendix A <br />reflecting the Current Year and Prior Years Recommendations to Improve Financial Management, <br />are included in the reporting section of the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and <br />include two significant deficiencies and one material weakness plus two management letter comments <br />(observation and recommendation) along with management’s responses to correct/improve <br />(corrective action plan) these reported matters and a status of prior year findings and <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />Other Matters <br /> <br />We applied certain limited procedures to Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Budgetary <br />Comparison Schedules – General Fund and Community Redevelopment Agency, Schedules of <br />Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios, Schedule of Contributions, and Schedule of <br />Investment Returns – Pension Trust Funds, Schedules of City’s Proportionate Share of Net Pension <br />Liability and Contribution – FRS & HIS and the Schedule of Changes in the City’s Total OPEB <br />Liability and Related Ratios, which are required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements <br />the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the FOR PROPOSAL PURPOSES ONLY - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.