Laserfiche WebLink
SUNNY �5�6 <br />04 .. sem <br />a <br />s CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH <br />FLOR`O <br />C,,F Or (UN A <br />CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH <br />DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS <br />Discipline: <br />Traffic Engineering <br />Reviewed by: <br />Diana White, PE /James Kemp, EI <br />Review Date: <br />1/31/22 <br />Phone: <br />(954) 921-7781 <br />Fax: <br />(954) 921-8807 <br />Application: <br />Traffic Statement Review <br />Project Name: <br />La Playa <br />Project Number: <br />16-9130 <br />Comments Based on: <br />4t" Submittal La Playa Traffic Study dated 1/14/22 and Site plan <br />No comments <br />X <br />Comments as follows or attached <br />Traffic Study <br />The following are comments based on the review of the Traffic Analysis for the above-mentioned <br />project prepared by David Plumer and Associates and dated 1/14/2022. <br />1. Please provide a traffic study for our review, as per the approved methodology dated 11/17/2021 <br />incorporating our office review comments from 11/30/21 <br />CGA Response 1/10/22: No response letter was received. Satisfied. Please see additional comments 5 <br />to 10 below. <br />DPA Response 1/13/22: Comment Noted <br />2. Please provide the Trip Generation Rates used in the calculations. Additionally, for the Multifamily — <br />High Rise please use the "Not Close to Rail Transit" rates as the project is not located within the vicinity <br />of Rail Transit. <br />CGA Response 1/10/22: No response letter was received. Partially Satisfied. The Multifamily — High <br />Rise uses the "Close to Rail Transit" rates. Please revise this to the "Not Close to Rail Transit" rates, the <br />project does not meet the ITE definition of "Close to Rail Transit". <br />DPA Response (1/13/2022): The trip generation and report have been updated to use Multifamily — <br />High Rise "Not Close to Rail Transit" rates. <br />CGA Response 1/18/22: Satisfied. <br />3. Please include the Internal Capture Matrix or pairings used in the calculation of internal trips. <br />CGA Response 1/10/22: No response letter was received. Satisfied. <br />4. The square footage of the Spa in the trip generation calculation does not match the architectural plan. <br />Please revise these to be consistent. <br />CGA Response 1/10/22: No response letter was received. Satisfied. <br />5. Please include Intersection Volume Development sheets showing the calculations for Existing, Future <br />Background, and Future Total volumes used in the Synchro Analyses. <br />1 <br />80 <br />