Zoning Resolution 22-Z-189 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CGA Response 1/18/22: No revised analysis or supporting document was provided with this resubmittal DPA Response 1/26/2022: The other modes of transportation deduction was based on data provided by the US Census Bureau. Non -captive adjustments were based on the internalization between land uses. Even though the analysis shows an internalization between land uses of 10%- 12% the non -captive adjustment was capped to 8% for the restaurant, 2% for the pool bar and 5% for the spa. No adjustment was applied for the employee parking. The non -captive adjustments were based on engineering judgement taking into consideration the land uses, location of the project and demographics. CGA Response 1/27/22: Satisfied. Site Plan Comments from Review Letter dated 12/21/22 The following are comments based on the review of the Site Plan 1. Please provide a copy of the driveway connection approval letter or meeting minutes from FDOT District 6 for the proposed driveways connections to Collins Avenue. Response: FDOT letter forthcoming CGA Response 1/18/22: No letter or meeting minutes were provided with resubmittal Response 1/26/2022: A copy of the driveway connection approval letter from FDOT District 6 for the proposed driveways connections to Collins Avenue will be provided as part of the Building Department Permitting process. CGA Response 1/27/22: Not Satisfied. Please provide meeting minutes for the FDOT Pre - application meeting to be held on 2/2/22 2. The width of the southernmost access driveways is wide enough to handle 4- lanes of traffic, 2 in each direction. Is there a reason for the proposed width of 50 feet? Having additional pavement width especially by the access driveways encourages conflicting traffic movements. Please address this issue. Response: Acknowledge CGA Response 1/18/22: Not addressed, according to the provided traffic study, only one WB LT and one WB RT Lane are being provided at the main access project driveway. Please address this issue. The provided traffic study and analyses need to be consistent with the provided plans. Please provide mitigation methods to discourage conflicting movements at the main access driveway. E.g. Medians, traffic separator, pavement markings, reducing the throat width of the access driveway, etc. Response 1/26/2022: The two-way traffic at this driveway will be clearly delineated with a striped double yellow median to narrow down the width of the entry and exit lane for the 50' driveway, please refer to the revised sheet C4. CGA Response 1/27/22: Satisfied. 3. Please provide on the plans sight distance triangles at both access driveways. Response: Acknowledge CGA Response 1/18/22: Not addressed. No sight distance triangles were shown on the plans. Please provide the plan sheet where the sight distance triangle will be shown and make sure there are no sight obstructions within those two triangles by the access driveways. Eg. Trees, structures, etc. Response 1/26/2022: Sight distance triangles are shown on sheets C4, C5 and C10. CGA Response 1/27/22: Satisfied. 3 82