Laserfiche WebLink
Calvin, Giordano 8 Associates, Inc. <br />E S C E P T 1 0 N A L S O L U T I O N S <br />It has been found that even the best component peer <br />review process, though effective within the particular <br />discipline being reviewed, may miss the big picture <br />and result in a lack of congruence in the overall prod- <br />uct. It is for this reason that CGA has instituted the pol- <br />icy of a multi - disciplined review of the product before <br />it is released to the client. By involving the whole team <br />in the entire project quality process, a sense of owner- <br />ship can develop which keeps team members focused <br />on quality throughout the design process. <br />CGA's philosophy and corresponding process to assure <br />quality in all of our designs and work products inte- <br />grates the following key components: <br />• Initial Quality of Design <br />• Multi discipline Peer Review <br />• Design Decision Documentation <br />• Constructibility Review <br />• Value Engineering <br />• "Community Engineering" <br />• Post- Construction Re- Examination <br />Each of these components is described in detail below: <br />Initial Quality of Design - The first step of the QA/ <br />QC process is to ensure that the plan document is of <br />"high initial quality". In other words, the preliminary <br />plan document is one that has been carefully thought <br />through and comprehensively analyzed by a qualified <br />engineer with expertise specific to the demands of the <br />project. Design tasks are not assigned to engineers that <br />do not have sufficient expertise in the areas required, <br />or that do not have sufficient experience to be able to <br />make competent key decisions early in the design pro- <br />cess. A preliminary design must be able to stand alone <br />on its own merits, and it is an unacceptable practice at <br />CGA to allow engineers to omit "pieces' of the design <br />presuming agency reviewers or others will fill in the <br />gaps. <br />Multi- discipline Peer Review: The next step in the <br />QA /QC process is the performance of a multidisci- <br />pline peer review This phase of review is undertaken <br />by a committee of designers from various disciplines <br />within the firm (or "core team" when teaming with <br />others) so that potential improvements or innovative <br />ideas can be introduced to further improve the initial <br />design. This process is important to ensure that relat- <br />ed design elements from the various disciplines work <br />cohesively so that one discipline's component does <br />not cause problems for another discipline's portion <br />of the design. A perfect example is in the design of a <br />divided roadway with median landscaping in which <br />the roadway engineer, traffic engineer and landscape <br />architect mast make sure that all sight distances and <br />clear zones are maintained for the project. <br />This peer review group therefore may consist of the <br />following: <br />• Roadway Engineers <br />• Civil Engineers <br />• Utilities /Drainage Engineers <br />• Traffic Engineers /Transportation Planners <br />• Land Planners <br />• Surveyors <br />• Urban Designers <br />• Landscape /Streetscape Architects <br />• Electrical Engineers <br />• Environmental Scientists <br />• Construction Management Personnel / CE) <br />• Structural Engineers <br />This peer review is typically conducted in a "work- <br />shop" or "charette" type setting in which participants <br />sit around a large conference table with the plans and <br />have easels and /or white boards available to sketch <br />out concepts or revisions. The participants trouble- <br />shoot for fatal flaws, provide critiques, and generally <br />toss around, and often debate ideas and possible inno- <br />vations to the plans. <br />Design- Decision Documentation - Although docu- <br />mentation is an important part of all projects, it is crit- <br />ically important to fully document the assumptions, <br />reasoning, calculations, etc. leading up to any key de- <br />sign decisions made on a project, particularly if safety <br />issues are involved. The process of documentation not <br />only provides good records, but it provides another <br />opportunity for the decision makers to examine the <br />logic of the decisions made, as things often become <br />more apparent when a written record of the process is <br />made. This inherently leads to better decision - making, <br />RFQ No. 14 -07 -02 1 Continuing Professional Services 58 <br />