Laserfiche WebLink
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are <br />conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's <br />ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, <br />including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter. <br />Auditors' Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements <br />Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole <br />are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors' report <br />that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute <br />assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS <br />and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. <br />The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one <br />resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, <br />misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if <br />there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the <br />judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements. <br />In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we: <br />• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. <br />• Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due <br />to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such <br />procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures <br />in the financial statements. <br />• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit <br />procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an <br />opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is <br />expressed. <br />• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant <br />accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of <br />the financial statements. <br />• Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the <br />aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern <br />for a reasonable period of time. <br />We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other <br />matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal <br />control—related matters that we identified during the audit. <br />Required Supplementary Information <br />Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the <br />management's discussion and analysis on pages 5-16, the budgetary comparison schedules on <br />pages 68-71, the schedule of changes in the Total OPEB liability and related ratios on page 72, <br />and the pension schedules on pages 73-76, be presented to supplement the basic financial <br />statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the <br />2 <br />