Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mark Castano, P.E. February 21, 2024 <br />Keith & Associates, Inc. . Page 2 <br />Geotechnical Study – Intra Coastal Sports Complex – 15800 Collins Avenue NV5 Project No.: 17990 <br /> <br />CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENERGY - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> <br />Samples of the subsurface materials were recovered at roughly 2-foot intervals within the upper 10 <br />feet of the borings and at approximately 5-foot to 15 feet below grade, and 2-foot intervals thereafter <br />using a Standard Penetration Test split-spoon sampler (SPT) in substantial accordance with ASTM D- <br />1586, "Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." This <br />test procedure drives a 1.4-inch inner-diameter split-tube sampler into the subsurface profile using a <br />140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The total number of blows required to drive the sampler the <br />second and third 6-inch increments is the SPT N-value, in blows per foot, and is an indication of <br />material strength. Upon completion of the borings, the boreholes were backfilled with soil cuttings <br />and the upper few feet closed with cement grout. <br /> <br />The soil/rock samples recovered from the borings were initially classified in the field. The collected <br />samples were later re-examined in the laboratory by a geotechnical engineer to confirm field <br />classifications. Visual soil classifications were made in accordance with ASTM D2487 and ASTM <br />D2488. The results of the classification and consequent generalized stratification are shown in <br />Drawing 2, the boring summary sheet, and in the records of test borings in Appendix A (sheets A-1 <br />through A-5). Strata contacts shown on these drawings are approximate. <br /> <br />3.2 FIELD PERMEABILITY TEST <br /> <br />NV5 performed also one (1) field permeability test to 15 feet deep at the location shown on Drawing <br />1. The test was performed in general accordance with the South Florida Water Management <br />District’s Usual Open Hole Procedure. Test results are presented in Appendix B (sheet B-1). <br /> <br /> <br />4.0 LOCAL GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS <br /> <br />4.1 LOCAL GEOLOGY <br /> <br />Miami-Dade County is located on the southern flank of a stable carbonate platform on which thick <br />deposits of limestones, dolomites and evaporites have accumulated. The upper two hundred feet of <br />the subsurface profile is composed predominantly of limestone and quartz sand. These sediments <br />were deposited during several glacial and interglacial stages when the ocean was at elevations <br />higher than present. <br /> <br />In many portions of Miami-Dade County, surface sand deposits of the Pamlico Formation are <br />encountered. The Pamlico sands overlie the Miami Limestone. In western Miami-Dade County, <br />portions of the Everglades Region interfinger with the Pamlico sand. The Everglades soil consists of <br />peat and calcareous silt (marl). <br /> <br />The Miami Limestone is a soft to moderately hard, white, porous to very porous, sometimes sandy, <br />oolitic calcareous cemented grainstone. The formation outcrops in portions of Miami-Dade County. <br />The Miami Limestone has a maximum thickness of about 35 feet along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge <br />and thins sharply near the coastline and more gradually in a westerly direction. The Miami <br />Limestone was formed about 130,000 years ago at a time when the sea level was twenty-five feet <br />higher than it is today. This environment facilitated formation of concentrically layered sand sized <br />carbonate grains called oolites. These grains formed by repeated precipitation of calcium carbonate <br />around the nucleus of a sand or shell grain. <br /> <br />The Miami Limestone can be separated into two facies: the barrier bar oolitic facies and the tidal <br />shoal limestone facies. The barrier bar facies is characterized by lenses of oolitic limestone