My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUNACON CONSTRUCTION
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
ITB
>
(25-01-01) City Annex Building Construction Renovations
>
Responses
>
LUNACON CONSTRUCTION
>
LUNACON CONSTRUCTION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2025 1:14:15 PM
Creation date
3/10/2025 1:09:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I.& <br />1r <br />LUtiAcoN <br />YOUR CONSTRUCTION PARTNER <br />Contractor Name: LUNACON EW4NEERING GRCKJP, CORP. DIWA: LUNACON CON oTRUCT(ON GROUP <br />10JECTIVE RA ,TINGSAND DEFMITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR <br />VALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE <br />RATING [DEFINITION NOTE <br />(EI Exceptional <br />Performance meets contractual requirements <br />Exceptional rating is appropriate <br />Ind exceeds many to the <br />hen the Contractor successfully <br />vernmenVOwneir's benefit The contractual <br />erformed multiple significant events <br />erformance of the element or sub -element <br />at were of benefiitto the <br />I)eing assessedvwas accomplished vita few <br />ovemrruentlthuner. ril sirrgtilar benefit, <br />+rn nor problems for which corrective actions <br />owever, could be of such magnitude <br />aken by the contractor was highly effective. <br />hat it alone constitutes an Exceptional <br />ting. Also., there should have been NO <br />irgnificant weaknesses identified. <br />(VG) Very Good <br />Performance meets contractual recimmments <br />Very Gwd rating is appropriate when <br />and exceeds some to the <br />be Contractor successfully performed a <br />wernment7siO wner's benefit_ The <br />pign Meant event that was a benefit to the <br />ntractuall performance of the element or <br />ovemment/Owner. There should have <br />ulrelement being assessed was <br />peen no :significant weaknesses <br />ocomplished with some minor problems for <br />dentified. <br />Mich corrective actions waken by the <br />=tractor were effective. <br />(S) Satisfactory <br />Performance meets minimum contractual <br />N Satisfactory rating is appropriate when <br />requirements- The contractual performance of <br />here were only mincer problems, or <br />he element or sub -element onr Uns some <br />ajor problems that the contractor <br />minor problems for which corrective actions <br />covered from without impact to the <br />taken by the contractor appear or were <br />ontract. There should have been NO <br />atstactory- <br />ignificant weaknesses identified. Per <br />OD policy, a fundamental principle of <br />ssigning ratings is that contractors will <br />-iot be assessed a rating rower than <br />atisfacvtory,+ solely for not performing <br />eyrondthe requirements ofthe contrac . <br />IMl Marginal <br />Perforriiance does not meet some contractual <br />Marginal is appropriate when a <br />requirements. The contractuaf perb;rnanceof <br />ignificant ev'�entoccuued'that the <br />he element of su"lement being assessed <br />ontractorrhad trouble overcoming <br />reflects a serious problem for which the <br />uhick impacted the <br />ntractor has not yet identified corrective <br />3ovemmentfOwner. <br />actions. The contractor's proposed acbens <br />appearonly marginally effective Drwere re riot <br />fully implemented. <br />(U) <br />Performance does not meet mst contractual <br />n Unsatisfactory rating is appropria`e <br />Unsatisfactory <br />Wrements and recovery is not likely+ in a <br />Nhen multiple significant events <br />imety manner. The contractual performance <br />ccurred that the contractor had trouble <br />element or sub -element contains <br />wercoming and wh ch impacted the <br />�the <br />rices proWem(s) for which the contractor's <br />ovemment/Owner. Asingular prolblr , <br />rrective actions appear or were i neffe dive, <br />lowever, could be of such serious <br />atgnitude that it alone constitute s a n <br />nsatisfactoryr rating. <br />M(N) Not <br />oinformation ordid not applytoyrour <br />g will be neitherposiUve nor <br />finable <br />rontract liegauve. <br />Lunacon Engineering Group Corp dba. Lunacon Construction Group <br />iTB No. 25-01-01 City Annex Building Construction Renovations <br />Due Date: 05 March 2025, 430 PM 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.