My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2026-3963
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2026
>
Reso 2026-3963
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2026 12:18:57 PM
Creation date
3/17/2026 12:14:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2026-3963
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/19/2026
Description
Approve Purchase & Assignment of TDRs amount 120,972.18 Sq. ft. of FAR & (48) Dwelling units from City's Public TDR Bank to MB RE Investments, LLC.
Supplemental fields
Comment
Heard with Companion Zoning Reso 26-Z-221; Item 5A.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY OF SCOPE OF WORK (Continued) <br />The existence of any environmental hazard such as the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic <br />substances, radon gas, asbestos -containing materials, urea -formaldehyde insulation, etc, which may <br />or may not be present in or on the subject property or any site within the vicinity of the property was <br />not observed by the appraiser and the appraiser has no knowledge of any such environmental hazard. <br />The appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. The value estimate is predicated. <br />on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in <br />value. <br />Also, no independent investigation of concurrency matters regarding the subject or any comparable <br />sale was made. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or <br />engineering knowledge required to discover them. The user of the report should therefore consult <br />an attorney, contractor, accountant, engineer or other experts as necessary to verify technical data <br />which could impact on the value of the property. <br />There are three primary approaches to value which should be considered. They are: (1) the Cost <br />Approach, (2) the Sales Comparison Approach, and (3) the Income Capitalization Approach. <br />The Cost Approach utilizes the value of the subject land as estimated from the market together with <br />a replacement cost estimate of the structures and site improvements. From this a deduction must be <br />made for accrued depreciation: physical, functional, and economic, if any, to provide an additional <br />estimate of the total property value. <br />The Sales Comparison Approach involves an investigation and inspection of recent sales in the area <br />and competing areas as nearly similar as possible to the subject. The sale properties (comparable <br />sales) are then compared with the subject, and adjustments made for dissimilar characteristics. <br />The Income Capitalization Approach, designed for application to income producing properties, <br />utilizes a technique of capitalizing the net income into an estimate of value. The factors included <br />in the technique are derived from a study of other similar type income properties. <br />In all cases, except an appraisal of vacant land, it is necessary that all approaches should be <br />considered and that those applicable approaches be utilized to form an estimate of value. <br />When more than one approach is used, although the indication of value may not be identical, they <br />should establish a reasonable range and act as a cross check upon one another. <br />After arriving at the value estimates and establishing a range of value (by more than one approach), <br />these estimates must be correlated into a single conclusion of value. In formulating this conclusion, <br />it must be determined which approach is best supported and conforms realistically with the multitude <br />of factors relating to the subject property. <br />The subject is vacant land. Thus the only applicable use of value is the Sales Comparison Approach. <br />on <br />544 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.