My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Miller Legg Bid Document (37)
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(26-07-01) Continuing Professional Architectural & Engineering Consulting Services (CCNA)
>
PROPOSALS
>
Miller Legg
>
Miller Legg Bid Document (37)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2026 1:32:25 PM
Creation date
8/31/2026 1:30:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RFQ #26-07-01 Continuing Professional Architectural and Engineering Consulting Services | 26MLA00190 <br />| Page 81 ReferencesSection 5 <br />RFQ # 26-07-01 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING <br />SERVICES (CCNA) <br />Page 41 <br />CITY OF SUNNY ISLES BEACH <br />18070 Collins Ave. | Sunny Isles Beach, FL 33160 <br />305.792.1707 | sibfl.net | Purchasing@sibfl.net <br />REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE <br />It is the responsibility of the proposer to provide a minimum of three (3) different references other than City <br />of Sunny Isles Beach using this form and providing this information with your submission. Failure to do so <br />may result in the rejection of your submission. <br />Giving reference for: (Firm) _______________________________________________________________ <br />Firm giving Reference: ____________________________________ _______________________________ <br />Phone: ____________________________________________ <br />Email: ___________________________________________ <br />1.Q: Rate the firm’s success in providing their services as it relates to the project. <br />A:The firm provided quality services, met project requirements, and completed the work professionally and <br />on time. Overall rating: 9/10 (Excellent). <br />2.Q: Rate the competence and accessibility of the personnel directing, supervising and <br />performing the work on your project. <br />A:The project personnel were highly competent, professional, and readily accessible throughout the project. <br />Overall rating: 9/10 (Excellent). <br />3.Q: Would you use them again? <br />A: Yes <br />4.Q: Rate the level of commitment of the firm toward your project. Did the firm devote the time and <br />personnel necessary to successfully complete your project? <br />A: <br />5.Q: Rate the firm’s success at providing the services as specified in the agreement meeting reporting dates <br />and content? <br />A: <br />6. Q: Is there anything else we should know, that we have not asked? <br />A:No further comments. The evaluation has covered all key aspects of the firm's performance, and we are <br />satisfied with their overall service. <br />The undersigned does hereby certify that the foregoing and subsequent statements are true and correct <br />and are made independently, free from vendor interference/collusion. <br />Name: _______________________________________ Title _____________________________________________ <br />Sign Name: __________________________________ Date: _________________________________________ <br />Miller Legg <br />City of Tamarac <br />christopher.lyle@tamarac.org <br />(954) 724-2449 <br />Christopher Lyle Project Manager <br />PROJECT: University Drive Landscaping <br />Improvements <br />The firm consistently met the requirements of the agreement, delivering reports on time with complete and accurate <br />content. Overall rating: 9/10 (Excellent). <br />The firm was professional, responsive, and cooperative throughout the project. Their commitment and quality of work <br />contributed significantly to the project's successful completion. <br />7/29/2026 <br />Landscape Architecture Project Reference #2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.