My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2015-2445
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2015
>
Reso 2015-2445
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2016 1:00:08 AM
Creation date
8/6/2015 4:13:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2015-2445
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/16/2015
Description
Ratify Agmt to Retain Srvs of Holland & Knight Law Firm
Send to Dept
Legal
Supplemental fields
Delivery Status
Reso Delivered on 7/26/2016 1:00 AM to Legal Dept.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. Respondent's witnesses presented speculative evidence regarding Respondent's <br /> ability to obtain various permits from a host of governmental entities. <br /> At trial, Thomas Checca was permitted to testify that it was reasonably probable that <br /> Respondent could obtain the requisite permits to develop it as a private docking facility. Trial T. <br /> 675-76. On cross-examination, Mr. Checca conceded that in order to develop the property for <br /> such use, Respondent would be required to obtain permits from a host of governmental entities, <br /> including the Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management <br /> ("DERM"), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the City of Sunny Isles Beach. Trial T. 680, <br /> 696. This testimony was allowed despite the fact that Respondent had taken no affirmative steps <br /> to apply for any such permits. Trial T. 606. <br /> Stephen Carney was also permitted to testify that it was reasonably probable that the <br /> requisite environmental permits would be issued, which would enable Respondent to develop the <br /> property as a docking facility. Trial T. 589-90. On cross-examination, Mr. Carney conceded <br /> that DERM would not have necessarily accepted the Uniform Mitigation Assessment score that <br /> Mr. Carney assigned to the property, which he relied upon in determining. the permit would be <br /> issued by DERM. Trial T. 601-02. And although Mr. Carney testified that he had spoken with a <br /> DERM employee regarding the possibility of obtaining the necessary permits, Trial T. 598, he <br /> acknowledged on cross-examination that the State of Florida's Department of Environmental <br /> Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would also have jurisdiction over any permit <br /> applications. Trial T. 604-05.1 No such permit applications had been submitted. Trial T. 606. <br /> In addition, Mr. Rahenkamp was allowed to testify that the property could likely be re-zoned to recreation and <br /> open space, and that docks would be permitted under that desienation. Trial T. 638, 640. On cross-examination, <br /> however, he acknowledged that Respondent would have to submit an application to the City of Sunny Isles Beach to <br /> re-zone the property to such desienation. Trial T. 642. Mr. Rahenkamp also admitted that Respondent had not <br /> submitted any permit applications to Miami-Dade County or the City. Trial T. 653. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.