My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Bid Protest Hearing
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
ITB
>
(07-10-02) Central Island Drainage
>
Bid Protest Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2015 10:27:14 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 10:26:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(8) The City Manager may, by administrative order, establish a set of criteria of a numerical <br /> nature that may be utilized in awarding contracts hereunder. <br /> B. The contract shall be awarded by the City Manager or the City Commission, as the case may <br /> be, with reasonable promptness by appropriate written notice to the lowest responsible and <br /> responsive bidder whose bid meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for <br /> bids, ('emphasis added") <br /> As applied to the instant case, the City Manager clearly followed the above criteria in awarding <br /> Bid No. 07-10-02 to Southeastern. As set forth in the attached Exhibit "D", the City Manager A. John <br /> Szerlag recommended that Southeastern be awarded the bid because they were the most responsible <br /> bidder with the lowest price.3 Mr. Szerlag made this recommendation based on the information that he <br /> reviewed and his experience.' Notably, Mr. Szerlag's professional background includes 25 years of <br /> experience as an Executive Manager for local municipalities, during_ which time he awarded <br /> approximately $500 million worth of contracts.' <br /> Based on the information that he reviewed and his experience, Mr. Szerlag determined that <br /> Southeastern "has the capacity to complete an extremely complex project." 6 Mr. Szerlag confirmed that <br /> he considered the factors delineated in Section 62-8 of the City Code prior to recommending the bid <br /> award. Utilizing this criteria, Mr. Szerlag deemed Southeastern to be the lowest responsible and <br /> responsive bidder. In contrast, Mr. Szerlag found that Tran "failed to satisfy all the criteria set forth in <br /> Section 62-8" and more specifically "failed to demonstrate fully that it had the capacity and skill to <br /> perform the job."9 <br /> Because the City strictly followed the competitive bidding requirements set forth in Sections 62-7 <br /> and 8 of the City Code, the bid award to Southeastern should be affirmed. <br /> B. The City has the authority to select the bid that is in the best of the City under the bid <br /> documents <br /> The bid award should be affirmed for the additional reason it was consistent with the contract <br /> documents and specifications. Section 62-7 of the City Code states in relevant part that "[ajn invitation <br /> for bids (including RFPs and RFQs) shall be issued and shall include specifications and all contractual <br /> terms and conditions applicable to the procurement." In conformity with this requirement, the City <br /> issued its contract documents and specifications for Bid No. 07-10-02.10 This documentation clearly <br /> 3 See attached Exhibit "D" at ¶ I1. <br /> Id. <br /> 3 Id. at 11 3, 4 and 6. <br /> 6 Id. at id 11. <br /> 7 Id. at"J 12. <br /> 8 Id. at id 13. <br /> 91d. <br /> 10A copy of the referenced sections of the contract documents and specifications is attached hereto as <br /> Composite Exhibit "E". <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.