My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-0717 Regular City Commission Meeting
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2003
>
2003-0717 Regular City Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2015 1:45:09 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 12:00:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
Regular
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
07/17/2003
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Through its attempt to vest rights in numerous high- <br /> density projects, both unbuilt and built, which were <br /> illegally approved through the City' s administrative <br /> site plan review procedures, the LDRs violate the <br /> above-referenced Intergovernmental Coordination <br /> Element . <br /> • The LDR' s "FAR bonus" system' s reliance on a monetary <br /> contribution in consideration for increased floor area <br /> ratio (as opposed to onsite design solutions) fails to <br /> "encourage adequate and efficient provision <br /> of . . . expanded on-site landscaped open space, increased <br /> view corridors and additional public cross access <br /> corridors to public beaches" as set forth in Objective <br /> 1G; <br /> • The Land Development Regulations improperly attempt to <br /> vest rights in proposed developments which are <br /> completely incompatible with the as-built character of <br /> Golden Beach, and thus inconsistent "with the <br /> character of the surrounding community" and <br /> inconsistent with Objective 4 ; <br /> • By allowing developers to purchase additional floor <br /> area ratio, as opposed to requiring on-site mitigation <br /> or linking the bonuses to on-site features, the Land <br /> Development Regulations violate Objectives 10A, lOB, <br /> and 14 ; <br /> • By approving Land Development Regulations which seek <br /> to vest development rights for a series of high- <br /> density projects which were illegally approved, the <br /> combined effect of which will generate traffic that <br /> will cause the appropriate levels of service to be <br /> degraded, the Land Development Regulations contravene <br /> both the Capital Improvements Element and the <br /> Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> With specific reference to this traffic' s impact on <br /> hurricane evacuation, the Land Development Regulations <br /> are inconsistent with Objective 12 of the <br /> Transportation Element and Objective 6 and Policies 6A <br /> through 6G of the Coastal Element . <br /> 21 . By virtue of the close proximity of Golden Beach and <br /> the Schlesingers to Sunny Isles Beach, all of the plaintiffs <br /> will suffer, to a greater and different extent than the <br /> 7 <br /> SHUBIN & BASS, PA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.