Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"EXHIBIT A" <br /> <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br /> <br />TASK 1. <br /> <br />Confirm Relevant Land Use Assumptions <br /> <br />T A will issue a memorandum which summarizes the relevant land use assumptions under trends <br />growth so that the likely capital facility needs due to growth and the need for impact fees can be <br />clearly shown when calculated. This will reflect population, households, housing units by type, <br />employment and nomesidential square footage by type. This will be for at least 10 years. <br /> <br />Work Product: <br /> <br />Memorandum Projecting Population, Housing, Employment and <br />Nonresidential Square Footage <br /> <br />TASK 2. <br /> <br />Ascertain Demand Factors and Level of Service for Relevant Public Facilities <br /> <br />There are several important components to this task. The first is ascertaining the actual <br />demand that generates the need for new capital facilities. Factors that are likely to influence. <br />demand include land use type and intensity, demographic characteristics such as number of <br />persons per household, trips by type of land use, etc. <br /> <br />A second important subtask is calculating the appropriate level of service. We will determine <br />the appropriate level of service through additional onsite interviews and analysis of local <br />data. The level of service description will vary by activity. <br /> <br />Work Product: See Below <br /> <br />TASK 3. <br /> <br />Review Capital Needs and Costs and Allocate to Growth <br /> <br />This task will determine relevant capital needs and associated capital facility costs due to new <br />growth. <br /> <br />A. Long-Range Capital Needs. In this subtask, we will further review the various studies and <br />other data germane to the relevant client capital facility activities, including the capital facility <br />needs due to new development over the next five plus years. The discussions may include not <br />only an understanding of the specific costs to provide public facilities and services, but also <br />discussions pertaining to whether these capital facilities needs were due to normal replacement, <br />catch-up or correction of existing facility deficiencies, or new demand. The issue of catch-up <br />( deficiencies) will be evaluated in the context of whether new development should be paying for <br />higher levels of service than those that currently exist. <br /> <br />B. Review Cost Estimates. In this subtask we will review, as relevant, the various capital costs <br />for public facilities. As part of this subtask, we will ascertain whether the facilities are likely to <br />be bonded, and if so, the amortization schedule. <br /> <br />Page 7 of9 <br /> <br />Impact Fee Study - Tischler & Associates.agr <br />