My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2003-533
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2003
>
Reso 2003-533
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:41:01 AM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:57:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2003-533
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
03/20/2003
Description
– Express Opposition to SB1164 & HB113, Bert J. Harris, Jr. Act.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003-533 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />SUNNY ISLES BEACH, FLORIDA, EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO <br />SENATE BILL 1164 AND HOUSE BILL 113 WHICH SET FORTH <br />AMENDMENTS TO THE BERT J. HARRIS, JR. ACT AND ANY AND <br />ALL OTHER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS THAT WOULD SUBJECT <br />LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTS TO FURTHER LIABILITY FOR <br />THE CONSTITUTIONAL EXERCISE OF THEIR LEGISLATIVE AND <br />QUASI-JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS; DIRECTING <br />THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THE RESOLUTION TO THE <br />PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE AND <br />GOVERNOR; SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Bert J. Harris Jr. Private Property Rights Protection Act. ("Harris Act"), <br />as codified in Section 70.001 of the Florida Statutes, was enacted in 1995 to provide a limited <br />remedy for property owners when their property has been "inordinately burdened" by the action <br />of a governmental entity; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, since its inception, numerous commentators and governments alike have <br />expressed concern that the Harris Act is impermissibly vague, fraught with various problems in <br />its application and interpretation, and has had a chilling effect upon numerous governments in <br />their planning and zoning activities; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in the eight years since the enactment of the Harris Act, there have been <br />over 258 claims asserted against local governments in Florida; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, despite its various constitutional infirmities relating to, inter alia, its failure <br />to define "inordinate burden" and "reasonable, investment-backed expectations;" the automatic <br />ripeness provisions that appear to violate separation of powers doctrine; and the uncertainties <br />inherent in its attempt to create a statue of limitations period; the Act nonetheless provided in <br />clear language that it does "not affect the sovereign immunity of government"; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, on July 18, 2002, a case affectin~ one of the cities of Florida, namely Royal <br />World Metropolitan, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 11 t Judicial Court Case No. 99-17243 (Royal <br />World), resulted in a favorable summary judgment for the City which determined that the <br />doctrine of sovereign immunity protects the City from liability for damages under the Harris Act <br />and said case has been appealed and is pending in the Third District Court of Appeals as of the <br />commencement ofthe 2003 Session ofthe Florida Legislature; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the legislation proposed via Senate Bill 1164 and House Bill 113, if <br />constitutional, in part seeks to nullify the effect of the Royal World decision and adversely affect <br />the ad valorem taxpaying public of Florida in as much as 258 other claims pending statewide, by <br />not only providing that such waiver is retroactive to May 11, 1995 and <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.