Reso 2003-562 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

powers and the addition of the words including, but not limited to the setting of policy, approval of budget, determination of tax rates, hiring and firing of the Charter officers and the development of community land policy. The whole numbers of votes cast was 512, of which number: Yes [Xl 263 votes were received No [] 249 votes were received (14) Procedure to amend Charter. The City Charter currently initiatives and referenda (including Charter revisions) to be held at a general or special election called for that purpose. The Revision Commission is proposing to allow a special election to be conducted by mail for these purposes only (but not for election of candidates). The whole numbers of votes cast was 512, of which number: Yes [] 253 votes were received No [Xl 259 votes were received (15) Charter Revision. The Charter currently provides for a Charter revision the fifth (5th) year after adoption and thereafter every tenth (10th) year which implies but does not state that each Commissioner shall be entitled to appoint one Charter Revision Commission member from his/her district, provided that such appointee be ratified by a majority of the Commission. The Charter Revision Commission is recommending that the Charter so specifically state. The whole numbers of votes cast was 503, of which number: Yes [Xl 280 votes were received No [] 223 votes were received (16) Technical and Stylistic Amendments. The Charter Revision Commission has recommended that the Charter be amended to reflect non-substantive stylistic and technical changes made for clarity including titles, county name change and renumbering of sections of the above-described amendment be adopted. The whole numbers of votes cast was 509, of which number: Yes [Xl 287 votes were received No [] 222 votes were received R2003- Accepting Special Election Results Page 5