My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2004-706
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2004
>
Reso 2004-706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:41:14 AM
Creation date
1/25/2006 1:57:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2004-706
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
09/09/2004
Description
– Award Bid 04-07-01 to Horsepower Electric for 159th St. & 174th St. Lighting.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF RULB 14-22 F,A.C, <br />THAT STIPULATE THE RBQUlREMBNTS FOR USING <br />A SURETY TO lNCREASE BIDDING CAPACITY. <br /> <br />(R. 7/01) <br /> <br />bt;LDq 1:he App~icani: <br />14-22.003(2) (a)2.a <br /> <br />2. Except for the provisions of Rule 14- <br />22.003 (2) (a) 2.a above, the MQR for firms that <br />havull Ability Score 0[91 or greater will" be the <br />"'Aggregate o[COlltracts" amount stipulated in the <br />surety commitment letter, An MCR established <br />through the we ala 8U1'ety commitment lettel' shall <br />not l%Ceed the "Aggregate olContracts" amount <br />sttpuJated In the 81l1'ety commitment lett.1'. <br />. . 3. Uac of a surety commitment letter to <br />Increase an anDlicant's Maximum..Canacitv Rattnll <br />wIll onlY be considered if at the time of atmiication <br />the'lDnlicant's Cummt Ratio Factor is at least 1.00 <br />as defined in ,RUle Section 14-22.003(2)(a)3.. and <br />the apnllcant has an Abllitv Score of 80 or himer. <br />No event(a) during the qualification perior:l <br />subsequent to the ending date of the audited <br />finQlu:ial" l1atemsnts uaed for qual(fication will be <br />cof!8itJered in determining an qppllcant's Current <br />Ratio Factor. ' <br /> <br />. a. Notwithstanding the' requirements in Rule Sections 14- <br />22.003 (2) (a) and 14-22.003 (1.) (a) l.a., l.b., I.e., 1.eL, and <br />14.22.003 (2) (a) 2. above; the AF, (Ability Pactor) win ,be <br />. 1i~ted to a maximum of 4, if the applicant rebeives an ability <br />score of76 or less on tho Initial app1icatlo~ or receives an ability <br />. score of76 on two or moro Prime Contractor.Past Performance . <br />Rcporta on file for. projects oomplllted during the 12 month <br />period preceding the applicant'a fiscal y.car ending date for <br />which the Certificate OfQllallilcation Is being issued. The use of <br />a surety commitment letter to miso the MCR Is prohibited UDder <br />this limitation. <br /> <br />b. This AF limitation will remain in effect during the current <br />qualification period. <br /> <br />R.a1::inq the AppUc:ant <br />14-22.003 (2) (b) <br /> <br />(b) Bonding Capacity, <br />l:~ccpt for the provisions of Rule 14-22.0Q3 (2) (a) <br />. 2.a above,. an applicant qualifying for a positive rating under the <br />above provisions., has an Abillty Score of 80 or hhz:hor and has a <br />Current Ratto Factor of at least 1.00, shall be allowed to mise it' a <br />MCR upon receipt of evidence of a current bonding capacity <br />exceeding the calculated MCR?rolil a surety company <br />authorizl;d to do business in Florida. Such evidence shall be in <br />the form of a letter of c:omJi1itmcnt executed by an officer of the <br />su~ who is authoriz.cd to bind the Surety, with power of <br />attorney attached. The surety letter must be dated within four . <br />mo~tbs of the request and cover the certification period. The <br />limit for an MCR i33USd on the 11a.ri.t obut:h bond commitment <br />for applicants with an Ability Score 0[80 through 90 will be <br />determined by thefo!lawing "~Surety Capacity "formula: <br /> <br />RM:::;: <br /> <br />Surety Capacity <br /> <br />SllRty Multiplier (Detcrmlnl:d from <br />Ability SCOla- Surety Multiplier Table <br />as provided on front ofwarksbcct) , <br /> <br />Maximum Capacity Rating <br />(Determined as provided"1n 14-22.003 <br />(2) (a) <br /> <br />Jlll-gil:lilit;y ~oz: Obtaining PropoeaJ. <br />DOCWll8l1U' <br />14-22.0Q8 (5.) , <br /> <br />(5) A qualified bidder will be iSSlled proposal <br />documents for any number of projec~ provided the <br />estimated contract amount of any individual project <br />requested does notcxcced their Current Capacity. Except <br />.. for the pr.ovisions of Rule 14-22.003 (2) (a)2.a above, <br />puall:ficd :firms that desirC,to bid a nroicct which. exceeds <br />their Cum:nt Canacitv, and whose CmTent Ratio FactoT <br />was at least 1.00. based on the financial statements.used <br />for current Qualification, and that have an Abilitv Score of <br />. 80 or himel. will be' allowed to bid that snccific-nroicct if <br />the firm furnishes a commitment letter from B. !IUl'etv <br />comnanv authorized to do business .in 'Elorida that does <br />not exceed the finn's Surctv Capacity as established bv <br />14-22.003(2)(\))1. <br /> <br />~C=SM~MC~x(CRV I!R) <br /> <br />In which: <br /> <br />sc= <br /> <br />MeR= <br /> <br />TRV= <br /> <br />Construction Revenues (As set forth In . <br />IIpplican~s financial stateml:llts per 14- <br />22,002 (2) (c) 2- <br /> <br />Total Rcmwcs (As set forth .In <br />applicant's financial statement) <br /> <br />CRV= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.