Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />-LJ----~ <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />~-. caused when the small diameter sampler encounters s mall voids, 0 r s and filled voids. When <br />n larger excavations are perfonned the limestone will be found to be quite unifonn. <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />(" <br />\~-1 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />u <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />L-J <br /> <br />RECREATION BUILDING <br /> <br />The site subsurface soil conditions are not suitable for support of the proposed recreation <br />building on shallow foundations. The proposed structure can however be safely supported on <br />deep foundations. The most suitable deep foundation for the soil profile that exists on site is an <br />auger cast pile foundation. Driven piles may have difficulty penetrating the limestone support <br />layer and could induce damaging vibrations to adjacent structures. Pile lengths between 20 and <br />30 feet and pile di~eters between 14 and 16 inches were evaluated. During the analysis any <br />compression capacity generated in the upper 16 feet of the soil profile was ignored due to the <br />peat and other compressible soils that were encountered. The upper soils were considered in the <br />calculation of tensile capacity. Piling capacity was calculated for each of the 2 deep borings. <br />Allowable Compression Capacity and Allowable Tensile Capacity are presented graphically in <br />Figures 1 and 2 below for 14 and 16-inch diameter auger cast piles. It should be noted that the <br />tensile capacity is low relative to the compression capacity. This is due to the very loose soils <br />encountered above the limestone layer and the fact that the xrl.ajority of the compression capacity <br />is due to end bearing in the limestone layer. Vibratory rolling of the ground surface prior to <br />piling installation can significantly increase tensile capacity. The piling analysis that was <br />perfonned revealed an optimum piling length of 24 feet. This depth takes advantage of a hard <br />zone encountered within t he I imestone at that depth. Longer pile lengths result in lower end <br />bearing capacity and therefore lower compression capacity. For design purposes compression <br />capacities of 36 tons and 44 tons are recommended for 14 and 16-inch auger cast piles installed <br />to depths of 24 feet below the existing ground surface. This corresponds to a pile tip elevation of <br />-20 feet We further recommend tensile capacity for design of 15 and 18 tons for 14 and 16-inch <br />auger cast piles installed to depths of 24 feet below the existing ground surface. This value is <br />based on the assumption that the ground surface will be rolled heavily prior to the installation of <br />the piling. <br /> <br />555 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway. Sunrise, Florida 33325. (954) 835-9055. FAX (954) 835-9044 <br /> <br />/~-'~ <br />, I <br />\ i <br />". ./ <br />