My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2006-880
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2006
>
Reso 2006-880
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2010 9:42:06 AM
Creation date
4/9/2007 11:08:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2006-880
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
01/19/2006
Description
Interlocal Agmt w/County $347,000 Bond Funds: Redesign Active Park Proj.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of whether there is an associated budget adjustment) that substantially changes the original <br />intent of a project. <br /> <br />c) Any change that would increase Soft Costs for planning, design, and project <br />administration which exceeds the limit specified in Article III Section 3 (c)(I). <br /> <br />In the event that a Recipient has completed the approved scope of work for a Projcct and has <br />unexpended funds, the Recipient may submit a requcst to the County Manager's Office to expend <br />thcse funds in an existing or new budget line item for the Project. The County Manager is <br />authorized to approve such budget changes and expenses not to exceed 15% of the total budget. <br /> <br />G) Cost Overruns. During the execution of work on a Project, the Recipient may find that actual <br />Project costs exceed the approved budget. For cost overruns that will require additional funding for <br />the Project, or otherwise require a budget adjustment for which prior Board approval is required <br />pursuant to paragraph E above, the Recipient shall: <br /> <br />I) Provide a justification for the additional costs; <br /> <br />2) Identify available funds for the completion of the Project; and, if necessary <br /> <br />3) Request from the Board a change or revision in the Project scope consistent with the <br />tcrms of the Ordinance. <br /> <br />The Board, at its discretion, may authorize in writing a change or revision in thc scope of the <br />Project: (i) where change or revision of the scope is consistent with the Ordinance; and (ii) where <br />the change or revision is justified by the Recipient; and (iii) where the Recipient does not have <br />sufficient funds to complete the Project with the available funds. Under those circumstances, the <br />Board, in its sole discretion, may identify other funds available under the Ordinance for the Project. <br /> <br />SECTION 2. COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITIES <br /> <br />The following constitute general requirements for program compliance: <br /> <br />A) An annual independent audit of the Building Better Communities General Obligation Bond <br />funds must be submitted by all Recipients to the County Manager's Office no later than six <br />months after the close of the Recipient's fiscal year for which a Funding Allocation was <br />received and each year thereafter until Project completion. The audit report must include the <br />Fund Summary Status Report, Exhibit 1. The audit must be performed by cel1ified independent <br />auditors and include the following: <br /> <br />I) Test for compliance with the Grant Agreement or Interlocal Agreemcnt, as the case may be, <br />Miami-Dade County Ordinance No. 05-47, applicable resolutions and the Building Better <br />Communities General Obligation Bond Administrative Rules. <br /> <br />2) Test to verify compliancc with advance requirements. <br /> <br />3) Sufficient tests, as determined by the independent auditor to verify true and accuratc <br />reflection of Project expenditures. <br /> <br />Building Bctter Communities Administrative Rules <br /> <br />18 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.