Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Department from imposing appropriate build out, construction, and deployment requirements on <br />cable and video certificate holders; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills require the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to <br />receive all customer service complaints thereby eliminating citizen ability to seek remedy of <br />complaints via their local government; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills establish requirements and limitations on municipalities and <br />counties relating to access to public right-of-way; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills prohibit municipalities and counties from imposing any additional <br />requirements on cable and video certificate holders; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills would deprive municipalities and counties of the authority to <br />establish and maintain government owned and operated networks, known as institutional <br />networks, that may be utilized by first responders and other government officials in the day-to- <br />day management oflocal government business; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills would potentially reduce the amount of capacity which may be <br />required by communities to meet public, educational, and government "PEG" access needs, <br />while stripping local governments, schools and other agencies of the ability to obtain capital <br />suppOli for the operation of PEG channels with the result that the communities' cable-related <br />needs and interests will not be met; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills do not require providers of cable, video and broadband services to <br />provide such services to schools, libraries, and other governmental facilities without charge, <br />thereby depriving teachers, students and residents of important communications capabilities that <br />they currently enjoy; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills would deprive local citizens of the ability to address local issues <br />locally, by removing to the State all customer service issues; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills would ultimately preempt all local authority over the provision of <br />cable and video services within the community, including the ability of the local government to <br />provide appropriate oversight to entities conducting business within their jurisdiction and in the <br />local public rights-of-way; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the bills would allow holders of existing cable franchises to terminate such <br />franchises unilaterally and thus, the bills constitute an impairment of contract; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, most importantly, the bills will not increase the opportunities for <br />competition in cable and broadband services for the benefit of consumers. In fact, the bills will <br />reduce competition. While HB 529 allows providers to serve or not to serve any area that they <br />chose thus creating the possibility that residents may lose cable service, HB855 mandates that <br />providers serve entire areas of jurisdictions thus making potential competition less likely. Under <br />existing local government franchising, competition in cable and broadband services has <br /> <br />R2007. Consumer Choice And Broadband Acts Opposition,Doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of4 <br />