My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-1029 Special Commission Meeting
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2009
>
2009-1029 Special Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2010 10:36:29 AM
Creation date
1/21/2010 11:27:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
Special
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
10/29/2009
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Summary Minules: Special City Commission Meeling Oclober 29, 2009 <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida <br /> <br />the Off-Duty Coordinator Sandra Block and when a company requests for off-duty, there is a <br />contract and an informational sheet that is provided to them. He said Ms. Block was <br />continuing to call RK to get this established and that is where the three-hour minimum for <br />the Officer coming in would have come into place. Mayor Edelcup said as he recalls at the <br />time discussions with Mr. Katz were started he had instructed our City Manager and City <br />Attorney, since it was an agreement between the Commission and Mr. Katz, to negotiate, and <br />the instruction he gave was that it be at cost, and so Ms. Block may have tried to call and at <br />that point he stopped that proceeding and instructed the City Manager and City Attorney to <br />handle the negotiations directly, and so the answer to Vice Mayor Thaler's question is no. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Thaler said he has a problem because it appears to be money against safety, and <br />it is more important to save one child or resident from an accident than the money that is <br />involved here. He said there is a real easy way out of this one, if the candles are put back up, <br />the Police Officer would be gone, and the numbers would be reduced to a Crossing Guard <br />which is basically what Mr. Katz is asking for. The City would be paying for the Crossing <br />Guard not Mr. Katz and that would solve every one of our problems here. <br /> <br />Arnold Shevlin said they have had numerous discussions with the City Manager and staff <br />about this issue since we came before you and asked to have the candles removed so that <br />CVS would have proper access and would actually open the store. If the candles were to go <br />back up, there would be severe financial damages. Their agreement with the Commission <br />was proffered based on the fact that we would expedite working together with staff to obtain <br />a traffic light. We have spent a lot of our time with consultants, worked closely with the <br />City's consultants (Kimley-Horn) to try to get a traffic light approved. We had a meeting last <br />month with FDOT, and FDOT based on a Warrant Study that was submitted, denied the <br />traffic light, and they said to come back with new numbers justifying keeping 183rd Street <br />open, and getting a new signal at 182nd Street. On October 23, we circulated a letter to the <br />City Manager summarizing what happened at the last meeting with FDOT saying there are <br />three concerns that FDOT has about the traffic light: 1) we need almost a 60% variance in <br />order to get traffic light spacing; 2) there is a stacking issue; and the biggest issue 3) the <br />Traffic Warrant, and their argument was in Kimley-Horn's report to the Commission and to <br />FDOT that they were basing their Warrant Study on the fact that 183rd Street was going to be <br />completely closed, and that was the only way they were able to get it to work. So part of our <br />question today to you is to bring on another consultant that believes they can redo the <br />Warrant Study to keep 183rd Street as a right turn right out, spend another $5,000 to $7,000, <br />let them work in conjunction with our existing consultants. <br /> <br />Mr. Shevlin said that they came before the Commission to take the candles down, open the <br />intersection, and Mr. Katz agreed to pay for a Police Officer to protect the children. At the <br />Commission meeting, we never discussed how long or how much. Once we got a bill we <br />said that these numbers are astronomical and they are not justified. We spent time <br />monitoring the intersection and in the letter that we sent to the City Manager we came up <br />with one other alternative in the interim. There is an intersection at 951h Street and Collins <br />Avenue in Surfside, there is a sign, and a stop bar 40-feet before you get to the intersection <br />that says "Stop Here", and the intersection is open. There is another sign right at the corner <br />that says "Do Not Block this Intersection", and if we take time out and try that instead of <br />putting candles up it would keep the intersection open, it would avoid people from backing <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.