My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2010-349
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Ordinances
>
2010
>
Ordinance 2010-349
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2010 12:24:12 PM
Creation date
9/30/2010 12:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2010-349
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
09/10/2010
Description
Amd Chap. 33, Post Employment Restrictions under the City’s Ethics Code
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Rationale: The members of the Ethics Commission meet on a regular basis <br />and handle a full agenda consisting of complaints, appeals, request for <br />opinions and other policy matters. On occasion, a complaint may be time- <br />sensitive and it would be desirable to refer the probable cause determination to <br />a hearing examiner who might be in a better position to hear the matter on an <br />expedited basis. <br /> <br />Public hearings lasting a full day or longer may place too heavy a burden on <br />the Ethics Commission - a board of five volunteers, A related concern is the <br />potential difficulty in convening the same members of the Ethics Commission <br />to preside over a lengthy public hearing. Utilizing hearing examiners at the <br />initial public hearing conquers both problems and still affords the parties an <br />opportunity to appear before the Ethics Commission after the hearing <br />examiner furnishes his/her recommendation. <br /> <br />3. Subpoenas <br />Section 2-1074(g) <br /> <br />Recommendation: The Ethics Commission through the Office of the <br />Advocate shall have power to subpoena witnesses and require the <br />production of records concerning any investigation or enforcement action <br />within the jurisdiction of the Ethics Commission. When necessary to <br />properly respond to a request for opinion, the general counsel to the <br />Ethics Commission may request a subpoena from the Ethics Commission. <br /> <br />Rationale: The Office of the Advocate needs the flexibility to subpoena <br />witnesses and require the production of records without delay in some <br />investigations. The current system requires the Advocate to wait until the <br />Ethics Commission convenes a meeting before a subpoena can be requested <br />and offers no additional checks and balances than the proposed <br />recommendation giving the Advocate the authority to subpoena records or <br />testimony at his discretion, Furthermore, the proposed changes would mirror <br />the process of issuing subpoenas followed by the Office of Inspector General. <br /> <br />There are circumstances under which legal counsel to the Ethics Commission, <br />in order to prepare a legal opinion, requests additional information from the <br />requester who refuses to provide the requested information. This change <br />would specifically authorize legal counsel to request a subpoena from the <br />Ethics Commission in those rare cases when a party requesting an opinion <br />refuses to cooperate. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.