Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~ <br /> <br />restriction, the Ethics Commission reviewed Section 2-11.1(q) (two year rule) and Section 2- <br />11.1 (s)(1) (lobbyist). The Ethics Commission ruled that the Conflict of Interest Ordinance did <br />not prevent the consultant from appearing in support of the zoning changes as a County <br />consultant representing the Zoning Department. According to the Ethics Commission, "the <br />lobbying ordinance only applies to persons representing third parties who are seeking <br />government action in their favor." <br /> <br />00-145 September 19, 2000 <br /> <br />In RQO 00-145, the Ethics Commission considered the applicability of the two year rule to a <br />former County employee who sought an of counsel position with a law firm, primarily involving <br />his representation in connection with representing American Airline in the construction of the <br />North Terminal project at Miami International Airport. The Ethics Commission found that <br />Section 2-11.1 (q) (two year rule) prohibited the former County employee from lobbying any <br />County official on any issues related to American Airlines and the North Terminal Development <br />program. The Ethics Commission broadly construed the two year post employment restriction to <br />include "participat(ion] in any activities in your role as a liaison between American and county <br />departments where you seek to persuade county personnel to take a particular course of action in <br />regard to any issue which may come before the County Commission or any county board or <br />committee." <br /> <br />00-112 March 30. 2000 <br /> <br />In RQO 00-112, the Ethics Commission addressed the applicability of the two year rule to a <br />former biologist for DERM who was subsequently employed by an environmental consulting <br />company. In this private employment capacity, the former County employee sought to assist <br />companies trying to obtain permits from DERM, The Ethics Commission found that Section 2- <br />11.1(q) (two year rule) did not prohibit the former County employee from working with <br />companies doing business with the County, provided he did not lobby any department official <br />regarding permit applications from his clients. <br /> <br />00-08 February 9, 2000 <br /> <br />In RQO 00-08, the Ethics Commission opined on the two year rule as it applied to a former <br />Coral Gables employee who subsequently worked for a private engineering firm that did <br />engineering work for Coral Gables. The Ethics Commission ruled that the former City employee <br />was not precluded from working on engineering projects involving the Coral Gables, provided <br />they did not engage in lobbying activities prohibited by Section 2-11.1 (q)( 1). <br /> <br />99-56 December 20. 1999 <br /> <br />In RQO 99-56, the Ethics Commission opined whether a former County employee could apply <br />for a contract to provide entrepreneurial training for youth with the Metro Miami Action Plan <br />("MMAP"). The Ethics Commission found that Section 2-11.1 (q) (two year rule) did not <br />prevent the former employee from contracting with MMAP to provide entrepreneurial training <br />for youth, provided the former employee did not lobby any county officials or department. <br />