Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />APPENDIX" - QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW <br /> <br />November 7, 2007 <br /> <br />HB <br /> <br />HEVIA. BEAGLES & COMPANY. P. A. <br />PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING GROUP <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />To the Owners <br />GLSC & Company, PLLC <br />ffkla BKR Garcia & Company, PLLC <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of GLSC & <br />Company, PLLC (the firm) in effect for the year ended June 30, 2007. A system of quality control <br />encompasses the firm's organizational structure, the policies adopted and procedures established to <br />provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards. The elements of quality <br />control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standards issued by the American Institute of <br />CPAs (AICPA). The firm is responsible for designing a system of quality control and complying with it <br />to provide the firm reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards in all material <br />respects. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system of quality control and the <br />fmn's compliance with its system of quality control based on our review. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />AICPA. During our review, we read required representations from the firm, interviewed firm personnel <br />and obtained an understanding of the nature of the firm's accounting and auditing practice, and the design <br />of the fmn's system of quality control sufficient to assess the risks implicit in its practice. Based on our <br />assessments, we selected engagements and administrative files to test for conformity with professional <br />standards and compliance with the firm's system of quality control. The engagements selected <br />represented a reasonable cross-section of the firm's accounting and auditing practice with emphasis on <br />higher-risk engagements. The engagements selected included among others engagements performed <br />under Government Auditing Standards and audits of employee benefit plans. Prior to concluding the <br />review, we reassessed the adequacy of the scope of the peer review procedures and met with firm <br />management to discuss the results of our review. We believe that the procedures we performed provide a <br />reasonable basis for our opinion. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In performing our review, we obtained an understanding of the system of quality control for the firm's <br />accounting and auditing practice. In addition, we tested compliance with the firm's quality control <br />policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of <br />the firm's policies and procedures on selected engagements. Our review was based on selected tests <br />therefore it would not necessarily detect all weaknesses in the system of quality control or all instances of <br />noncompliance with it. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control <br />and therefore noncompliance with the system of quality control may occur and not be detected. <br />Projection of any evaluation of a system of quality control to future periods is subject to the risk that the <br />system of quality control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or because the degree <br />of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of GLSC & <br />Company, PLLC in effect for the year ended June 30, 2007, has been designed to meet the requirements <br />of the quality control standards for an accounting and auditing practice established by the AICPA and was <br />complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming <br />with professional standards. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />As is customary in a system review, we have issued a letter under this date that sets forth comments that <br />were not considered to be of sufficient significance to affect the opinion expressed in this report. <br /> <br /> <br />~p~:~~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />