My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Marcum Rachlin
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 10-06-01 Auditing Services
>
Responses
>
Marcum Rachlin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2010 1:36:43 PM
Creation date
11/8/2010 1:36:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Professional Audit Services
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
10-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning the Review for the Firm's Accounting and Auditing Practice <br />Applicable to Non-SEe Issuers <br /> <br />To plan the review of Rachlin LLP (flk/a Rachlin Cohen & Holtz LLP), we obtained an understanding <br />of (1) the nature and extent of the finn's accounting and auditing practice, and (2) the design of the <br />finn's system of quality control sufficient to assess the inherent and control risks implicit in its <br />practice. Inherent risks were assessed by obtaining an understanding of the finn's practice, such as the <br />industries of its clients and other factors of complexity in serving those clients, and the organization of <br />the firm's personnel into practice units. Control risks were assessed by obtaining an understanding of <br />the design of the finn's system of quality control, including its audit methodology. and monitoring <br />procedures. Assessing control risk is the process of evaluating the effecti veness of the reviewed firm's <br />system of quality control in preventing the performance of engagements that do not comply with <br />professional standards. <br /> <br />Performing the Review for the Firm's Accounting and Auditing Practice <br />Applicable to Non-SEe Issuers <br /> <br />Based on our assessment of the combined level of inherent and control risks, we identified practice <br />units and seleetcd cngagcments within thosc units to test for compliance with the film's system of <br />quality control. The engagements selected for review included engagements performed under the <br />Government Auditing Standards, and audits of Employee Benefit Plans. The engagements selected for <br />review represemed a cross-section of the finn's accounting and auditing pral:Lice with emphasis un <br />higher-risk engagements. The engagement reviews included examining working paper files and <br />reports and interviewing engagement personnel. <br /> <br />The scope of the peer review also included examining selected administrative and personnel files to <br />determine compliance with the firm's policies and procedures for the elements of quality control <br />pertaining to independence, integrity, and objectivity; personnel management; and acceptance and <br />continuance of clients and engagements. Prior to concluding the review, we reassessed the adequacy <br />of scope and conducted a meeting with firm management to discuss our findings and <br />recommendations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.