My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Marcum Rachlin
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 10-06-01 Auditing Services
>
Responses
>
Marcum Rachlin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2010 1:36:43 PM
Creation date
11/8/2010 1:36:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Professional Audit Services
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
10-06-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Sample Government, FLORIDA <br /> <br />SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES <br /> <br />FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 <br />(Continued) <br /> <br />I. CURRENT YEAR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued) <br /> <br />2009-04 Landfill Closure Liability <br /> <br />Criteria <br /> <br />Pursuant to GASB Statement No. 18, Accountingfor Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Closure and Post- <br />closure Care Costs, in determining the current period expense and liability, total estimated capacity <br />should be based on the expected usable landfill, which is generally the constructed portion. Further, the <br />estimated capacity should mirror the tonnage applicable to the constructed areas reported to the <br />Environmental Protection Agency. <br /> <br />Condition <br /> <br />During the 2009 fiscal year, the landfill was expanded and capacity increased from 35 acres to 46 acres. <br />However, we noted that the total estimated capacity used to calculate the current year expense and <br />liability did not change from the prior year. Further inquiry indicated that the total estimated capacity <br />being used to calculate the current period costs were 60 acres of land, which is the total acreage of land, a <br />portion of which had not yet been constructed. <br /> <br />Cause <br /> <br />The total estimated capacity used to calculated current period expense and liability was incorrectly set at <br />the full permitted acreage at inception, instead of at the constructed capacity. <br /> <br />Effect <br /> <br />The expense and liability related to the landfill was revised to use the appropriate total estimated capacity. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />We suggest that the entity consider having the engineers who prepare the Financial Assurance Cost Forms <br />for the landfill certify the capacity of the landfill as well as the cost estimates. <br /> <br />Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action <br /> <br />We concur that the total constructed portion of the landfill is the appropriate measure to use for current <br />period costs and landfill closure liability. Staff received the final volume quantities of the landfill based <br />on the annual survey completed by an independent engineering firm. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.