My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Addendum No. 5
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(10-04-02) Prof. Architectural Svcs.
>
Addendums
>
Addendum No. 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2010 11:56:09 AM
Creation date
11/9/2010 11:56:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Professional Engineering Svcs.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
10-04-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11. Q: We just received Addendum #4 for the RFQ #10-04-02 and there is conflicting <br />responses to critical submittal items. Addendum #4 question 7 indicates that relevant <br />projects are to be included in the ten pages BUT Addendum #3 question #4 indicates that <br />the project list are excluded from the 10 page requirement. <br /> <br />Also Addendum #4 question #8 indicates the authorizations are not included in the 10 <br />pages but addendum #3 indicates proof of authorization is not excluded. <br /> <br />We would appreciate clarification so we can provide an acceptable submittal. <br /> <br />A: Confusion reigns, my apologies to all. The jirst response was incorrect, the proofs will <br />not be counted as a part of the ten pages. <br /> <br />END OF SECTION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.