Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r I <br /> <br />NOT FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION / DO NOT COPY <br />This financial statement is private and exempt from public <br />inspection, or copying of public records pursuant to Florida <br />Statutes 119.071 (I)(c). <br /> <br />Metric Engineering, Inc. and Subsidiaries <br /> <br />Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements <br />June 30, 2009 <br /> <br />~ I <br /> <br />r I <br /> <br />1. Summary of Shmificant Accountine Policies (continued) <br /> <br />r 1 <br /> <br />New Pronouncements - continued <br /> <br />r I <br /> <br />In May 2008 F ASB Issued Statement Number 162 - The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted <br />Accounting Principles, to identify the sources of accounting principles and the framework for <br />selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental <br />entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The <br />current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants <br />(AICP A) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity <br />With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, has been criticized because (1) it is directed to the <br />auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and (3) it ranks FASB Statements of Financial <br />Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of due process as F ASB Statements of <br />Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices that are widely recognized as generally <br />accepted but that are not subject to due process. The Board believes that the GAAP hierarchy should <br />be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting <br />accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. <br />Accordingly, the Board concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature <br />established by the F ASB and is issuing this Statement to achieve that result. <br /> <br />r I <br /> <br />The Company has elected not to early-implement the following Statements issued by F ASB during <br />2009. Effective dates for implementation of Statement No. 160 - Noncontrolling Interests in <br />Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 are in 2010: <br /> <br />2. ACQuisition of Advanced Transportation Enl!ineerinl! Consultants. Inc. <br /> <br />The Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with the shareholders of Advanced Transpor- <br />tation Engineering Consultants (ATEC) to acquire 55% of the outstanding shares of ATEC (5% from <br />Elio R. Espino and 50% from Javier S Gonzalez) for a purchase price of $235,000; $152,000 payable <br />in cash at the time closing of the transaction and the remaining balance payable in installments of <br />$10,000 per month starting February 28, 2008 for Elio R. Espino and November 28,2008 for Javier <br />S. Gonzalez. <br /> <br />[1 <br /> <br />At the time of closing the equity of ATEC amounted to approximately $221,212. Consequently, the <br />purchase price was allocated by recording $221,212 as an investment in ATEC, $99,546 as minority <br />interest in subsidiary (representing the 45% owned by Elio R. Espino) and $113,333 as goodwill rec- <br />ognized in the purchase. As a part of the purchase a consulting agreement in the amount of $120,000 <br />was reached with Javier Gonzalez <br /> <br />: I <br /> <br />~ J <br /> <br />l j <br /> <br />~ J <br /> <br />~ I <br /> <br />8 <br />