My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Horsepower Electric #1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
ITB
>
(04-07-01) Roadway Lighting Improv. NE 159TH ST. & NE 174TH ST.
>
Responses
>
Horsepower Electric #1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2011 11:56:53 AM
Creation date
1/10/2011 10:15:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
NE 159TH ST. & NE 174TH ST. Roadwyay Lighting Improv.
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
04-07-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
Bid
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF RULE 14-22 F.A.C. <br />THAT STIPULATE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR USThTG <br />A SURETY TO INCREASE BIDDING CAPACITY <br /> <br />(R 7/01) <br /> <br />Rating the AppJ.icant <br />14-22.003(2) (a)2.a <br /> <br />Ra tinq the AppH.can t <br />14-22.003 (2) (b) <br /> <br />2. Except for the provisions of Rule 14- <br />22.003 (2) (a) 2.a above, the MC;R for firms that <br />have an Ability Score of91 or greater will' be the <br />"Aggregate afContracts" amount stipulated in the <br />surety 'commitment letter. An MeR established <br />through the use of a surety commitment letter shall <br />not exceed the "Aggregate of Contracts " amount <br />stipulated In the surety commitment letter. <br />. 3. Use of a suretv commitmen't letter to <br />increase an applicant's Maximum'Canacitv Rating <br />will onlv be considered if at the time of apnlication <br />the'apolicant's Current Ratio Factor is at least 1.00 <br />as defined in Rule Section 14-22.003(2)(a)3.. and <br />the aonllcant has an Abilitv Score of 80 or higher. <br />Na event(s) during the qualification period <br />subsequent to the ending date of the audited <br />financial statements wed for qualification will be <br />co~ered in detennining an qpplicant's Current <br />Ratio Factor. ' <br /> <br />a. Notwithstanding the requirements in Rule Sections 14- <br />22.003 (2) (a) and 14-22.003 (2) (a) l.a., l.b., I.e., l.d., and <br />14.22.003 (2) (a) 2. above, the AP, (Ability Factor) win'be <br />li~ted to a maximum of 4, if the applicant receives an ability <br />score of76 or less on the initial application, or receives an ability <br />score of76 on two or more Prime ContractOr.Past Penormance <br />Reports on file for. projects completed during tho 12 month <br />period preceding the applicant's fiscal y.ear ending date for <br />which the Certificate of Qualification is being issued. The use of <br />a surety commitment letter to mise the MCR is prohibited under <br />this limitation. <br /> <br />b. This AP limitation will remain in effect during the current <br />qualification period. <br /> <br />(b) Bonding Capacity. <br />tExccpt for the provisions of Rule 14-22.0q3 (2) (a) <br />. 2.a above, an applicant qualifying for a positive rating under the <br />above provisions, has an Abi1ltv Score of 80 or hill:her and has a <br />Current Ratio Factor ofat least 1.00. shall be allowed to raise it's <br />MCR upon receipt of evidence of a current bonding capacity <br />exceeding the calculated MCRlrom a surety company <br />authorized to do business in Florida. Such evidence shall be in <br />the form of a letter of commitment executed by an officer of the <br />surety who is authoriz.ed to bind the surety, with power of <br />attorney attached. The surety letter must be dated within four . <br />mo~ths of the request and cover the certification period; The <br />limit for an MCR issued on the basi.!: of .:uch bond commitment <br />for applicants with an Ability Score of 80 through 90 will be <br />determined by thefo!lawing ':Surety Capacity "formula: <br /> <br />EJ.ig~ility for Obtaining Proposal <br />Documanu' <br />14-22.008 (S} . <br /> <br />MCR= <br /> <br />Maximum Capacity Rating <br />(Determined as provided 'in 14-22.003 <br />(2) (a) <br /> <br />(5) A qualified bidder will be issued proposal <br />documents for any number of projects; provided the <br />estimated contract amount of any individual project <br />requested does not exceed their Current Capacity, Except <br />. for the provisions of Rule 14-22.003 (2) (a)2.a above, <br />'. 9ualified firms that desire 'to bid Ii oroiect which exceeds <br />their Current Canacitv. and whose Current Ratio Factor <br />was at least 1.00' based on the financial statements, used <br />for current Qualification. and that have an Abilitv Score of <br />. 80 or hilmer. will be allowed to bid that soecificoro;ect if <br />the firm furnishes a commitment letter from a surety <br />company authorizcd to do business .in F.lorida that does <br />not exceed the firm's Surety Caoacity as established bv' <br />I 4-22.003 (2)(b)1 , <br /> <br />~C= SMxMCRx(CRV /-:m) <br /> <br />In which: <br /> <br />sc= <br /> <br />Surety Capacity <br /> <br />SM"", <br /> <br />Surety Multiplier (Determined from <br />Ability Score- Surety Multiplier Table <br />as proyjded on front of worksheet) <br /> <br />CRV= <br /> <br />Construction Revenues (As set forth in . <br />app licant's financial statements per 14- <br />2.2..002 (2) (c) 2. <br /> <br />TRV= <br /> <br />Total Revenues (As set forth In <br />applicant's financial statement) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.