Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />designated as critical habitat for Johnson's seagrass, a biological opinion (a year-long process) is not <br />anticipated if any Johnson's seagrass found in the project area is avoided. <br /> <br />The NOAA Fisheries Habitat Conservation Division in West Palm Beach will be involved in the <br />evaluation of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). If any seagrass is found during the seagrass survey, all <br />efforts should be made to avoid direct impacts to seagrass patches as well as to any mangroves. <br />Seagrasses and mangroves are both considered as EFH. If seagrasses are observed, any decking <br />associated with the boardwalk would have to be elevated to a minimum of 5' above Mean High Water. <br />If significant amounts of seagrasses are found, or if any Johnson's seagrass is present in the footprint <br />of the walkway, fiberglass grating may be required (along with a demonstration that the walkway has to <br />be located in the waterway). <br /> <br />Navigational issues typically associated with bridge projects involve at a minimum coordination with the <br />USCG. Preliminary coordination with the Coast Guard has resulted in a letter indicating that a USCG <br />permit will not be required for this project since there is minimal navigational use of the waterway at this <br />location and that boats utilizing the area tend to be small and can easily navigate beneath the proposed <br />bridge. <br /> <br />The EPA office in West Palm Beach will be involved in the evaluation of consistency with the 404(b)(1) <br />wetland guidelines and water quality issues. Due to the small nature of the project, it is anticipated that <br />the EPA involvement will be minimal. <br /> <br />The State permitting process involves coordination with the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation <br />Commission (FWCC) for state listed threatened/endangered species, the Department of Community <br />Affairs (DCA) for a determination of consistency with local comprehensive plans and coastal zone <br />consistency, and the Department of State for identification of any listed historical/archeological sites. <br />Based on our analysis, the proposed project site is not located within the Biscayne Bay Aquatic <br />Preserve and would therefore not be within an area designated as Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW). <br /> <br />The key environmental permitting issues associated with the proposed project for the Corps, FDEP and <br />DERM include avoidance and minimization of impacts to any submerged aquatic resources, mitigation <br />to offset unavoidable resource impacts, secondary impact analysis (shading and associated <br />construction activities), and identification of threatened/endangered species. It is presumed that a <br />stormwater management plan is being prepared so that stormwater runoff is adequately treated and <br />that any discharge from the treatment system will meet state water quality standards. <br /> <br />Coordination with the FWCC office in Vero Beach will be similar to the coordination with the USFWS <br />and will primarily involve an analysis of impacts to the manatee. Incorporation of the Standard Manatee <br />Construction conditions should also satisfy the FWCC requirements. <br /> <br />Avoidance of direct impacts to seagrasses and elevation of all proposed structures should minimize <br />impacts to submerged aquatic resources. If it is determined that mitigation is required for shading, a <br />contribution to the Biscayne Bay Environmental Enhancement Trust Fund could be offered. If any <br />impacts to the mangrove community along the canal bank are unavoidable for the construction of the <br />boardwalk, a Mitigation Assessment Methodology (UMAM) will be conducted to quantify any wetland <br />impacts. On-site mitigation opportunities can be evaluated to off-set these impacts (e.g. removal of any <br />nuisance/exotic species within the mangrove areas and planting of additional mangroves along the <br />shoreline. <br /> <br />From a timeframe perspective, the most lengthy permitting process is associated with the Corps <br />Dredge & Fill Permit. Because of current workloads and the various coordination procedures, it is <br />anticipated that the federal permitting process could take up to a year. The SFWMD and DERM <br />process is not expected to take as long, and can hopefully be accomplished in 6 to 9 months. <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />