My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BKR Garcia & Co.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 07-04-01 Professional Audit Services
>
Responses
>
BKR Garcia & Co.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2011 9:51:36 AM
Creation date
1/28/2011 9:50:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Prof. Audit Services
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
07-04-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I APPENDIX III - MANAGEMENT LETTERS DEVELOPED AND ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDITS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II. STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />04-3 Report Submission (Continued) <br /> <br />Manaqement Response <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Management has drafted the required reports for FY 2004 and 2005 will submit to the State <br />immediately. Going forward, we assigned this task to a responsible staff member. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />04-4 Disbursement Process <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Condition <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />We reviewed the control procedures surrounding the disbursement processes and noted the <br />following weaknesses: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(a) Posting of vendor invoices in the accounts payable ledger is not properly segregated <br />from the check preparation activities. <br />(b) The system allows for posting of non-purchase order invoices in the accounts payable <br />ledger and to be processed for payment more than once. <br />(c) There are inadequate receiving and verification procedures for the purchase of goods <br />and services. Currently, the City processes invoices for payment based solely on the <br />approval of Department Heads without verifying that the goods and services were <br />actually received. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(a) We recommend that the City establish written policies and procedures that provide <br />proper segregation of duties and responsibilities in the Accounts Payable Function. <br />Personnel involved in the posting of invoices in the Accounts Payable Ledger should be <br />separated from the check preparation functions. <br />(b) We also recommend that paid vendor invoices and check vouchers be stamped "PAID" <br />as mitigating control to prevent possibility of processing vendor invoice for payment twice. <br />(c) We further recommend that the City develop policies and procedures on receiving <br />activities to verify and reconcile invoice details with the actual receipt of goods or services <br />before any payment is made. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Current Year Status <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The City did not implement any of the recommendations during the Fiscal Year 2005. This <br />comment will be repeated. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.