Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />APPENDIX III - MANAGEMENT LETTERS DEVELOPED AND ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUDITS <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TOWN OF SOUTHWEST RANCHES, FLORIDA <br />SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 <br />(CONTINUED) <br /> <br />SECTION 11- STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />2004-3: Invoice date per accounting system is different than actual invoice date (Continued) <br /> <br />Status: The Town corrected the problem as soon as the problem was discovered by the auditors. <br />However, since this problem was still present for most of the year 2005, this comment will be repeated. <br /> <br />Management's Response: The new financial system implemented in October 2005 will prevent this <br />system design flaw from happening again. <br /> <br />2004-4: Individual funds not in balance <br /> <br />Condition: The individual fund balance of the different funds of the Town in the trial balance provided to <br />the auditors at the beginning of the audit was not in balance. In addition, the fund balance did not agree <br />to the audited financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2003. <br /> <br />Recommendation: We recommend that the person in charge of recording transactions review the <br />propriety of the transaction and adjust the due to/from accounts for transactions affecting more than one <br />fund. We also recommend that upon receipt of the list of audit adjusting journal entries adjustments be <br />recorded in the Town's accounting system. The accounting year should not be closed unless account <br />balances and fund balance/deficit per the accounting system agree to amounts per the financial <br />statements. Furthermore, once the accounting year is closed, fund balances per the accounting system <br />should be compared to fund balances per the financial statements. <br /> <br />Status: The trial balance provided to the auditors for the September 30, 2005 audit did not reflect the <br />proper beginning balance (September 30, 2004 audit balance) for two of the funds included in the trial <br />balance. This comment shall be repeated. <br /> <br />Management's Response: Management agrees with the recommendation that all adjusting entries <br />should be posted and that the individual funds should be in balance. We will review the fund balances on <br />a regular basis. <br /> <br />15 <br />