My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2011-1687
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2011
>
Reso 2011-1687
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2011 5:08:59 PM
Creation date
2/28/2011 5:08:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2011-1687
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
02/23/2011
Description
Pay Expert Costs and Attorney Fees in Eminent Domain Case SIB Vs. Marks Et AL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />JMD Engineering, Inc. <br />(Engineering expert) <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />12,546.41 <br /> <br />Eagle Express <br />(Trial Exhibits) <br /> <br />11,238.56 <br /> <br />United Reporting <br />(Depositions & Hearing Reporting) <br /> <br />597.1 0 <br /> <br />Veri text Florida Reporting <br />(Depositions & Hearing Reporting) <br /> <br />1,260.60 <br /> <br />As to the remaining attorney fees and the fees for experts hired by Defendants: Eric <br /> <br />Rahenkamp, a land planner Robert Miller of Miller Appraisal Group Inc., a real estate appraiser; <br /> <br />and Richard Klusza and Brian Goding of Klusza and Goding, Inc., real estate appraiser. The <br /> <br />court finds as follows: <br /> <br />It was reasonable for Defendants' counsel to hire the above appraisal experts to prepare <br /> <br />and try their case. The witnesses' work was essential to counsel in the preparation and trial of <br /> <br />full compensation. Florida Statute l66.045( I )(b) requires a municipality to obtain at least two <br /> <br />appraisals before purchasing any property for more than $500,000.00. The amount in <br /> <br />controversy herein was more than Ten Million Dollars. It is therefore obvious that it was not <br /> <br />unreasonable for counsel to hire two appraisers. Both appraisers gave preliminary opinions to <br /> <br />counsel on the issues of full compensation. One, Robert Miller, testified at trial. The others, <br /> <br />Kluzsa & Goding provided a preliminary opinion of full compensation and prepared full reports <br /> <br />and prepared to testify at the apportionment trials that had been set and settled. The use of two <br /> <br />appraisers was neither excessive nor unreasonable. <br /> <br />Page 2 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.