My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reso 2011-1691
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Regular
>
2011
>
Reso 2011-1691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 4:27:24 PM
Creation date
4/5/2011 11:02:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Resolutions
Resolution Type
Resolution
Resolution Number
2011-1691
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
03/08/2011
Description
Agmt. w/Rep Svcs, Inc. for purchase of playground equipment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />further participation. Neither the County Attorney nor any assistant county <br />attorney shall be subject to this subsection or prohibited from engaging in ex <br />parte communications with the hearing officer. <br /> <br />16. The purpose of this policy is to promote fairness and public <br />confidence in the competitive bidding process. To further such end, and <br />except as otherwise specifically provided herein, the substantive law <br />governing the resolution of bid protests found in the decisions of the Florida <br />appellate courts, as well as any statutes or agency rules that may be <br />applicable to the particular bid solicitation, shall guide the hearing officer <br />and the Board in rendering a decision on a bid protest under this section. <br />The significant principles of law governing the bid protest and the resolution <br />thereof, which shall prevail to the extent not otherwise in conflict with any <br />governing statutes or agency rules, are as follows: <br /> <br />a. The burden is on the party protesting the award of the bid to <br />establish a ground for invalidating the award. <br /> <br />b. The standard of proof for the protest proceeding shall be whether <br />the proposed award was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, <br />arbitrary, or capricious. <br /> <br />c. The proposed award shall be deemed arbitrary or capricious if it is <br />contrary in a material way to any governing statutes, the County's <br />rules or policies, or the bid or proposal instructions or specifications. <br /> <br />d. The scope of the inquiry is limited initially to whether the proposed <br />award is improper under the foregoing standard of proof. If and only <br />if the hearing officer first determines on the basis of competent and <br />substantial evidence that the proposed award is improper, then the <br />hearing officer may recommend, in accordance with the law and this <br />policy, an alternate disposition for the proposed award. Such <br />disposition may include, but shall not be limited to, rejecting all bids, <br />or awarding all or a portion of the bid to the protesting party. <br /> <br />e. A bid protest proceeding may not serve as a vehicle for the Board <br />to revisit the proposed award absent a determination of impropriety as <br />set forth above. <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />.~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.