My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Wingerter Laboratories Inc.
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFQ
>
(11-07-01) Special Inspection Svcs, including Geotechnical/Const. Admin.
>
Responses
>
Wingerter Laboratories Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2011 3:18:48 PM
Creation date
8/30/2011 3:18:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Special Inspection Svcs
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
11-07-01
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFQ
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1'1'AMI.b,'",.t~~:) <br />I~Ti'~;]r-~ '') <br />~ill!J l~~~.... <br /> <br />M!AMI..DADE COUNTY <br />PUBLIC WORI<S DEPARTMENT <br />Project Evaluation <br /> <br />Consultant Name: Wingerter laboratories, Date: 3-7-11 <br /> Inc. <br />Contract Name Soils, Foundations and Work Order No. 66443 <br /> Geotechnical Testing Services <br /> Amount of Work Order: $ 20,400 PWD Assignment tJ: <br /> User Department: Miami Dade Parle &. Recreation <br /> User Dept. Project Manager: Jose A. Gonzalez Phone Number: 305-755-7833 <br /> Project Description: Pile inspections, Compressive Strength Grout Cubes, Moisture <br /> 8t Density test at Haulover Park Ocean Hescue <br /> Rating I <br /> 4 3 2 1 N/A I <br />1 x Adherence to schedule- Minimizing delay to project. <br /> I <br />2 x Cost effectiveness- Compliance with proposal cost <br /> I <br />3 x Adherence to scope of work <br /> I <br />4 x Cooperation- Team Work & relationship with owner <br /> I <br />5 x Technical Skills- field worl< accuracy and procedures <br /> I <br />6 x Submittals- On time, drawings show all information requested <br /> I <br />7 x Responsiveness- Timely response to revisions and comments <br /> I <br />8 x Personnel- Quality and dedication of project staff <br /> I <br />9 x Quality- Work performed correctly the first time <br />Overall performance Raters Name: .:T 0512- G:,o~.\ '~p.LG L <br />average: f"\ <br /> Raters Signature , \ ~ -------/\ r <br /> y (J <br />Documentation that supports this evaluation and Consultant comments can be obtained by contacting: <br />Name: \ (~ ~~ I Phone I :)-uf <br /> I~ '\1' G ~L 'til\l\l ' No.: lOr" 7'1? l <br />Evaluation Reviewed by: Reviewers <br />,,"' c"~~"'."".:-:=~t~ Signature: <br />I c' ._,_ .."'-_...' ...,p 4 <br /> Supervisor I Division Chief I I Assistant Director I I Director I <br />Ratinq Key <br />4 Superior performance - Exemplary quality, no intervention required - project completed on time or early at or below budget with <br /> No change orders or amendments other than owner requested changes. <br />3 Satisfactory performance - Minor errors noted, addressed with timely corrective action. No serious errors noted or corrective action <br /> Needed. <br />2 Guarded performance Errors and Omissions documented in writing with timely corrective action, <br />1 Unresponsive performance documented In writing without timely corrective action. <br />N/A. No Information <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.