Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Summary Minutes: Regular City Commission Meeting <br /> <br />May 6, 2004 <br /> <br />City of Sunny Isles Beach, Florida <br /> <br />Dr. Robert Cornfeld, owner of the Newport Hotel, reported that in March, Pier Park was <br />used to allow commercial vehicles to park there because a commercial was being shot <br />there on their pier. He understands that this was against the regulations and was unaware <br />that this was being done, but apologized to the City Commission. He stated that in <br />November of 1999 the City Commission granted them a 99-year permit agreement and in <br />that agreement on page 6, paragraph 16, it says that they have the property for 99-years <br />and they have to obey all the regulations, and they have always done that except this one <br />time, and now the City has seen fit to terminate the 99-year agreement, under the <br />termination paragraph it says "not withstanding the foregoing and anything in this <br />agreement to the contrary, it is the intention of the parties that permittee shall have <br />unimpeded access to the pier and adjacent hotel property at all times." He said this was <br />because they have always had ingress and egress capabilities for 20-years, first it was <br />with Dade County. He said that they are in agreement with this Ingress Egress <br />Agreement and he feels that there should be a penalty. He said not only did the City <br />terminate their 99-year permit of the property, but they took away from them almost <br />$100,000.00 a year in parking revenue that they received from running Pier Park, which <br />they were allowed to do under the permit agreement. He said now the City will be <br />running the Park and deriving this revenue. He said he feels there should be a fine but to <br />ask for $450,000.00 is not right, and he offered to pay the City $100,000.00. <br /> <br />City Manager Russo clarified for the record saying that he agreed with what Dr. Cornfeld <br />is saying about what this agreement is, and that there is a section in that agreement that <br />provided for immediate termination, which is what was evoked and the City took over <br />the Park. He said at that point in our legal opinion the agreement was null and void, <br />therefore we went forward to negotiate a totally new agreement with a new entity on a <br />new parcel of land that was being subdivided and sold to La Perla, so he approached it as <br />though they were negotiating an arrangement and his initial approach was, that the access <br />in perpetuity that he would like the lifeguards paid in perpetuity at least, but said that was <br />unreasonable to a degree and he went to a proposal of lO-years and polled the <br />Commission and when he got through three Commissioners he had a clear direction to <br />get a five-year budget from this. He said they presented a competent agreement and <br />backed it up with every analysis and every question that has been asked by this <br />Commission to come up with a budget which was substantially higher than the <br />$450,000.00 that is in this proposal, and it is not a fine or a mitigation fee, it was part of <br />negotiations on a new agreement to get something in return for what we were giving. <br />Mayor Edelcup said that was a reduced number, and City Manager Russo said from the <br />$728,000.00 which is an actual budget that the City will pay, based on the City benefits, <br />expenses, equipment, and other items that make up the entire operation of the lifeguard <br />service at that one tower. Dr. Cornfeld said that the payment of the lifeguard has nothing <br />to do with their infraction of the rule, they broke the rule and they are sorry for it and <br />there should be a fine, but what has the lifeguard service have to do with it? <br />Commissioner Brezin asked Dr. Cornfeld what are you giving to us? Dr. Cornfeld said <br />you are getting $100,000.00 a year and Mr. Price said that the City is also getting the 29 <br /> <br />15 <br />