Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy <br />June 2011 <br /> <br />Appendix G <br /> <br />LMS Prioritization Matrix <br /> <br />Suitability Parameter: <br /> <br /> Parameter Weighting Scoring Criteria Score Points <br /> Factor <br />Suitability 30% <br />I Appropriateness of the 40% 5 - High: Reduces vulnerability and is consistent 5 200 <br /> Measure with Local Mitigation Strategy goals and plans for <br /> future growth <br /> 3 - Medium: Needed, but does not tie to identified <br /> vulnerability <br /> 1 - Low: Inconsistent with LMS goals or plans <br />2 Community Acceptance 15% 5 - High: accepted by most communities 5 75 <br /> 3 - Medium: accepted by most; may create burdens <br /> 1 - Low: Not likely to be accepted by any commu- <br /> nity ("Not in my backyard") <br />3 Environmental Impact 15% 5 - Positive effect on the environment 5 75 <br /> 3 - No effect on the environment <br /> 1 - Adverse effect on the environment <br />4 Consistent with Existing 15% 5 - High: Consistent with existing laws and regula- 5 75 <br /> Legislation and/or Poli- tions <br /> Cles 3 - Medium: New legislation or policy changes <br /> needed, but no conflicts identified <br /> 1 - Low: Conflicts with existing Laws and regula- <br /> tions <br />5 Consistent with Existing 15% 5 - High - Consistent with existing plans 5 75 <br /> Plans and Priorities 3 Medium - Somewhat consistent <br /> 1 - Low - Conflicts with existing plans and policies <br /> Parameter Subtotal 100% Sum of parameter scores; max = 500 500 <br />~uitability Subtotal (sum of parameter scores) / (maximum possible score) 100% <br /> <br />44 <br />