Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Miami-Dade Local Mitigation Strategy <br />June 2011 <br /> <br />Components Used to Prioritize Potential Mitigation Measures <br /> <br /> PARAMETER DEFINITION <br />Suitabilitv <br />Appropriateness of the meas- The extent to which a measure reduces identified vulnerabilities and <br />ure conforms to stated Local Mitigation Strategy goals, objectives and plans. <br />Community Acceptance The likelihood of the measure being accepted or perceived as positive by <br /> all, most, or only some of a community. The "not in my back yard" <br /> theory is a negative. <br />Environmental Impact An indicator of whether the measure will have a positive, negative, or <br /> neutral effect on the environment. <br />Legislation An indication of whether the measure can be implemented within exist- <br /> ing laws and regulations, or if it will require action at the legislative or <br /> senior management level policy changes. <br />Consistent with Existing Mu- A measure of conformance with existing planning documents and stated <br />nicipal Plans and Priorities goals and objectives of a municipality. <br />Risk Reduction Potential <br />Scope of Benefits The extent to which a measure benefits multiple municipalities, more <br /> than half of a community, or less than half of the community. <br />Potential to Save Lives How many lives, if any, will the measure save or protect. <br />Importance of Benefits The effect of a measure on essential services, such as life safety, human <br /> health, and basic necessities of life. <br />Level of Inconvenience or The extent to which a measure can avoid problems in the community, or <br />"Nuisance Factor." cause such as traffic congestion, delays, loss of power, etc. <br />Economic Effects and Proper- A measure of economic effects avoided, including both property damage <br />ty Damage A voided and economic losses suffered by businesses and residents such as busi- <br /> ness closings and jobs affected. <br />Number of People to Benefit A measure of the number of people expected to benefit from a measure. <br /> More than 100,000; more than 10,000; less than 10,000? <br />Cost <br />Initial Costs ofthe Project Actual anticipated total (federal plus local share) dollar costs of a pro- <br /> posed mitigation measure. <br />Ability to Maintain and Oper- Measures the ability of a municipality to maintain and operate the <br />ate equipment or facility after it is acquired. <br />Benefit to Cost Ratio A measure of total anticipated benefits divided by total costs, discounted <br /> appropriately and evaluated using FEMA's benefit/cost methodology. <br />Financing The extent to which resources are available to finance the cost of the <br /> measure, including sources of potential grants and matching funds. <br />Affordability An assessment of the measure's cost in relation to available resources. <br />Repetitive Damages The potential for a measure to reduce the frequency of repetitive damag- <br /> es at a facility. Past damages must have occurred and have been docu- <br /> mented. <br /> <br />47 <br />