Laserfiche WebLink
<br />') <br />) <br />) <br />~) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />., <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />DISPUTE DISCLOSURE FORM <br />ITEM #19.2 CONTINUED <br /> <br />As a major international engineering and architectural firm Stanley Consultants Inc. (SCI) becomes <br />involved from time to time with litigation involving its projects. None of these are significant to the <br />company's ongoing business operations. In order to protect the privacy of claimants and other parties, it is <br />our corporate policy not to release the names of litigants or details of specific claims. You have requested <br />information regarding claims. Claims which we are defining as lawsuits or demand for arbitration received <br />from clients in the last five years are as follows~ <br /> <br />1. Iowa. In 2007, SCI was named in a claim by a subcontractor for extra fees on a sewer/pump station <br />project. After investigation the matter was resolved. <br />2. Arizona. In 2007 SCI made a claim against a land developer for fees and received a counterclaim for <br />damages caused by survey error. The matter has been resolved. <br />3. Kentucky. In 2008 SCI was named a third party defendant by a utility client that had been sued by a <br />contractor for increased costs due to its error in locating a building structure. SCI has denied <br />responsibility and after negotiation, the various parties resolved the matter. <br />9. California. In 2010, SCI named as a defendant by a real estate developer on a project in Nevada. SCI <br />denied liability. The matter has been dismissed and refilled in Arizona where it is still pending. <br />10 Jamaica. In 2010 SCI was named as a defendant in a pending case involving a hotel whose fresh water <br />supply was contaminated when construction allegedly broke a water main. SCI was involved in <br />construction administration on an adjacent road project, the damage was likely done by a contractor <br />working on a separate water line project. The matter is still pending. <br />11. Utah. 2011, SCI entered into a subcontract with an architecture firm for work at a small airport, <br />designing portions of a hanger. The contractor ran over budget, suing the owner for extras. All the <br />design team members have been brought into the case which is still pending. SCI's portion of the work <br />was minimal and it has denied any liability and the parties were able to resolve the dispute. <br />12. Illinois 2011. An SCI employee was injured when struck by a car in a highway construction zone. He <br />sued the contractor and owner who have brought SCI into the case to try to dispose of our medical and <br />workers compensation liens. The case is still pending. <br />