My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-0920 Regular City Commission Meeting
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
City Commission Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-0920 Regular City Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 3:34:21 PM
Creation date
10/25/2012 2:22:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-City Commission
Meeting Type
Regular
Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
09/20/2012
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary Minutes:Regular City Commission Meeting September 20.2012 City of Sunny Isles Beach,Florida <br /> drops off. They also took measurements in the center of the Park during operational <br /> conditions to establish what ambient sound level we are going to input into the model and <br /> once it is in the model, it will predict from that source point of 68.8 what that relevant sound <br /> level will be at all the different receptor points at the varying elevations. The highest number <br /> was 68.8 and that represented 9 to 12 skateboard users with interaction with the concrete, <br /> pavement, rail, coming down hard, etc. The sound level exceeded 10% of the time. <br /> Mitigation options includes three (3) different possibilities: Design Option 1: started with a <br /> 230-foot wall that ran along the Skate Park,about 20 feet high,what becomes problematic is <br /> that you have receptor points at elevated balconies far above the Skate Park, obviously we <br /> can't build a wall 190 feet high and so they looked at 20 feet as the base, and the cost is <br /> $470,000; Design Option 2: they put in two flanking walls,a 10-foot high wall that tied into <br /> the concession stand, and a 100-foot wall,that is in two sections,to try to assist unit 1519 to <br /> get that western exposure to get rid of that flanking noise, with a cost of$695,000; and <br /> Design Option 3: which is the best option, not because it is the most expensive at$890,000, <br /> but because with higher elevations all the way up to the 23rd floor,that sound wave no matter <br /> how high the wall is, has an opportunity to go over the top of the wall, and the only way to <br /> get rid of the refraction over the top of the wall would be to have some type of exposure to <br /> trap that sound and push it back away from the receptor point, and so we have a 12-foot high <br /> wall for Design Option 3 with two feet high of acoustical louvers on top,and so it is in effect <br /> a 14-foot high wall. The louvers would assist in sound reduction by allowing some type of <br /> ventilation in the Skate Park. <br /> Mayor Edelcup said then the biggest reduction only occurs at the Skate Board Park and the <br /> Pool Deck,and Mr. Kinney said yes because of the close proximity locations,and the natural <br /> ambient is playing an important role in the overall sound. Commissioner Aelion said <br /> regarding typical sound level, the noise urban area daytime which is basically the regular <br /> traffic,etc. is at 70,and he doesn't see any variance of effect between the three options as far <br /> as the mitigated effect. They are nominal here and there but compared to the cost variance, <br /> between R1A to R7 there is almost no difference between the options as far as the sound <br /> effect is concerned. He said the Commission allowed the study to go forward in order to find <br /> a solution to mitigate the sound that is there which is bothering mainly the 600 and 300 <br /> building residents (Winston Towers) but from the results, worst case scenario, it equates to <br /> noise urban area daytime. He fails to see a substantive argument here unless there is <br /> something that has not been presented to us,evidence of allowing ourselves to implement the <br /> data here to make a educated decision to go forward. <br /> Commissioner Scholl asked regarding the relations of a decimal reading, is it linear or is it <br /> exponential? If we plot it, is it a straight line or is it a curve,and Mr. Kinney said logarithm. <br /> Commissioner Scholl explained that this means that if it goes from 50 to 60, that 10 is not <br /> proportional to the first 50, which means that 10 is larger than the first 10 in the 50. In other <br /> words a curve would go like that, and so it is deceiving when you look at the numbers <br /> because ultimately going from 60 to 80 is a lot bigger than going from 40 to 60. We need to <br /> be careful interpreting the data, it is not a percentage, it means it went up 5 points just like <br /> that, it didn't go up 5 points on a straight line, there is a big difference between the two. <br /> Really what the report is telling us is that the proposed solution does not work well for what <br /> our concerns are and it does not address the problem with the noise at the Skate Park. <br /> 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.