My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RFI No. 1
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 12-10-03 Artificial Turf for Senator Gwen Margolis and Pelican Community Parks
>
RFI No. 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 11:22:20 AM
Creation date
5/30/2017 11:21:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
35. Question: Normally the turf edging required is a continuously reinforced concrete curb, usually 6” wide <br />by 12” high, with a continuous pressure treated 2” x 4” nailer attached to the concrete curb. <br /> <br />Answer: The contractor is to furnish and install all required elements of the work to result in a complete <br />project. <br /> <br />36. Question: The RFP states that the fiber will be a polyethylene monofilament and a polyethylene <br />texturized blend. We are not sure if the preference is for a Monofilament only or a Monofilament and <br />Slit Film combination fiber. Can you tell us if there is a preference? We were not familiar with the <br />polyethylene texturized blend language. <br /> <br />Answer: Submittals must be responsive to the RFP. Refer to Section 2.14. <br /> <br />37. Question: Will the contractor be responsible for the removal and disposal of all spoils coming off the <br />fields as required for excavation to subgrade etc. prior to installation of drainage and the stone base? <br /> <br />Answer: Yes <br /> <br />38. Question: A site visit of Pelican Park reveals that there is existing artificial turf at the infield portion. Is <br />this existing turf to remain or be replaced? Please clarify. <br /> <br />Answer: The existing turf is to be replaced. <br /> <br />39. Question: A site visit of Gwen Margolis Park reveals that the existing fence line indicated on the drawing <br />issued in Addendum No. 1 is not representative of the actual conditions that now exist at the park. This <br />drawing is a landscape drawing and seems outdated. Is there an existing survey of the park that is <br />represents actual conditions? <br /> <br />Answer: There is not a more current survey of the park; however additional record information is <br />attached for reference. <br /> <br />40. Question A: Attached is a PDF printout showing the soccer field in Green and a perimeter runoff <br />(assumed) in yellow as depicted on your drawing from Addendum No. 1. The soccer field measures <br />approximately 270’ long x 147’ wide, which would be fine for youth soccer. Is this your intent to provide <br />fields for youth soccer? <br /> <br />Answer: Yes, <br /> <br />Question B: Is the runoff area depicted in yellow correct? If not, please indicate the correct area. <br /> <br />Answer: The City is not providing additional information regarding the runoff area beyond documents <br />issued with the RFP or attached hereto. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.