My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pro Grass
SIBFL
>
City Clerk
>
Bids-RFQ-RFP
>
RFP
>
RFP No. 12-10-03 Artificial Turf for Senator Gwen Margolis and Pelican Community Parks
>
Responses
>
Pro Grass
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2012 3:16:20 PM
Creation date
12/13/2012 3:02:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CityClerk-Bids_RFP_RFQ
Project Name
Artificial Turf for Gwen Margolis & Pelican Community Parks
Bid No. (xx-xx-xx)
12-10-03
Project Type (Bid, RFP, RFQ)
RFP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> TESTING SERVICES, INC. <br /> I T . 817 SHOWALTER AVE.•P.O.BOX 2041 <br /> PHONE (7 6ORGIA 307•FAX.1 NVL?P Code#100108-0 <br /> PHONE(706)2261100•FAX:(706)226£118 <br /> TEST REPORT <br /> ICLIENT: ACT Global Sports REPORT NUMBER: 51927M <br /> 197 Boling Industrial Way LAB TEST NUMBER: 2321-8064 <br /> Calhoun,GA 30701 DATE: May 20,2011 <br /> ITest Material: <br /> 1 Turf ID Infill <br /> Blend(FB Ultra+MN Ultra) 3.5 lbs/ft2 SBR Ambient Rubber mixed with 1.5 Ibs/ft2 Silica Sand <br /> SUBJECT: Testing Services Inc was instructed by the client to perform a procedure for measuring the <br /> I critical radiant flux of horizontally mounted floor-covering systems exposed to a flaming <br /> ignition source in a graded radiant heat energy environment in a test chamber. <br /> SCOPE OF TEST: This fire test standard is designed to provide a basis for estimating one aspect of the fire <br /> Iexposure behavior of a floor-covering system installed in a building corridor. <br /> • TEST METHOD: ASThf E648:Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems <br /> IUsing a Radiant Heat Energy Source <br /> TEST INFORMATION: Specimens of the sample were tested for critical radiant flux in accordance with ASTM Test <br /> Method E-648,NFPA 253 and FTM Standard 372. The value reported is the average of three <br /> Ispecimens,reported as Critical Radiant Flux in units of watts per centimeter squared(W/cm1. <br /> Mounting Board: Loose Lay in metal tray with infill installed <br /> Conditioning: Minimum 96 hrs @ 70°F 50%RH <br /> ICLASSIFICATIONS: NFPA: Class 1= 0.45 W/cm2 or higher <br /> Class II=0.22-0.44 W/cm1 <br /> I Non Classifiable=<0.21 W/cm1 <br /> TEST DATA: <br /> Specimen Time Distance al Radiant Flux <br /> I #1 10 min 101 an N/A Critic 0.00 W/cm2 <br /> #2 NIA WA WA <br /> #3 N/A N/A WA <br /> I Standard Deviation:0.00 <br /> Coefficient of Variation:00.0% <br /> Note: Testing discontinued after first specimen due to severity of fire. <br /> I TEST RESULTS: <br /> Average Critical Radiant Flux NFPA Classification <br /> 0.00 W/an' - No Classification <br /> IApproved By: • <br /> I Erle Miles,Jr.,VP <br /> Testing Services Inc. <br /> I <br /> I OUR LETTERS AND REPORTS APPLY ONLY TO THE SAMPLE TESTED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL <br /> OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. THESE LETTERS AND REPORTS ARE FOR THE USE ONLY OF THE CLIENT TO WHOM THEY ARE ADDRESSED AND THEIR <br /> COMMUNICATION TO ANY OTHERS OR THE USE OF THE NAME TESTING SERVICES.Inc.MUST RECEIVE OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. THE REPORTS AND <br /> LETTERS,AND OUR NAME.OUR SEALS,OR OUR INSIGNIA ARE NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE USED IN ADVERTISING TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. <br /> on.com <br /> ProGrass RFP No. 12-10-03 95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.