Laserfiche WebLink
FIELD SCIENCE <br /> and third drops are used to calculate an average Gmax for that test 'Hot spots- on the field can be identified and corrected. For the <br /> location. This procedure is repeated for the other five test locations field owner,routine hardness testing can insure that the field is per <br /> Figure 3 illustrates the procedure. If for some reason there is a need forming up to the manufacturer's claims.(The manufacturer's warran- <br /> for an additional drop at any test location then the test instrument ty for Gmax may be considerably lower than 200). For the manufac- <br /> should be moved to a new spot within 36 inches of the required test turer,testing can insure that the owner is maintaining the field in an <br /> location. One additional test location is permitted on each field if an appropriate and responsible manner. <br /> area is found to differ from the overall general condition of the field. Finally,while hardness-testing does not address all the safety con- <br /> Any location with an average Gmax>200 must be repaired or replaced cerns of an athletic field, nor guarantee that an injury won't occur. it <br /> Table 2. Required Information in ASTM F 1936-98 and F 1702-96 Reports. <br /> F 1936-98 F 1702-96 <br /> Issue Date of Report. Assumed to be reported.1 <br /> Name of lab,company or individual issuing report. Assumed to be reported.1 <br /> Name and location of test site. Name and Location of test site./ <br /> Dates)of site test. Date(s)of site test. <br /> Range of surface and air temperatures during test. Ermnorit ital conditions at the time of test hchdmg temperatures and Mnmidity. <br /> General weather conditions and overall weather influenced field conditions. <br /> Full and complete description of the surface system including all layers. Type and density of vegetation,and depth of thatch if present.Soil texture <br /> date of installation,and person providing this information. and moisture should be given. <br /> Name and method of test version and procedure. Type and model of instrumentation. <br /> Drop height and velocity. Total missile mass. <br /> Location of each test point. Location and type of surface(turf or soil). <br /> List of the average Gmax by test point and location. Average Gmax at each test location and average Gmax values for similar <br /> surface characteristics(optional). <br /> List surface temperature.%turf cover,and soil moisture at each test location. <br /> Description of any site abnormalities that lead to an imprecise test point <br /> location or deviation from locator, <br /> com- <br /> parable to data obtained using a different missile mass or geometry,a <br /> Note on report: 'Numerical data with this test method will not be com- <br /> Condusion:All test points met the requirement of<200 average Gmax <br /> different drop height,or using a different method,for example,Test <br /> or all test points met this requirement except for the test points listed. Method F 355' <br /> Note on report: 'Test results reported herein reflect the conditions of the <br /> \ested field at the time testing and at the temperature(s)reported.- l <br /> /Not specifically stated in procedure. <br /> is a very practical way to assess the impact injury risk of the field. <br /> Reporting results Hardness testing will provide you with very important information <br /> Table 2 shows the required field and environment information for about your investment.Written documentation concerning your fields' <br /> ASTM F 193698 and F 1702-96 reports. Optional information may hardness and your monitoring program could be very valuable in the <br /> include HIC. SI, rebound velocity, time to Gmax, as well as other event of injury related litigation. No documentation could place you in <br /> impact characteristics. a -No-Win' situation. <br /> The measurement of the shock absorbing properties of an athlet- Dr.Charles F Mancini)is manager of Synthetic Turf Testing Services <br /> is field should be an integral part of any maintenance program, and a consulting turfgrass agronomist with CLC LABS,Westerville,OH. <br /> regardless of whether or not the field is synthetic or natural. Dr.Charles H.Darrah is president and owner of CLC LABS.Deborah D. <br /> Procedures have now been developed that simplify the procedure by Holdren is sports and golf turfgrass research associate in the <br /> standardizing how the testing is to be performed. Routine testing can Horticulture and Crop Science Department at The Ohio State University <br /> help the field manager track changes in hardness and modify their and Pamela 1.Sherratt is sports turf extension specialist for Ohio State, <br /> maintenance plan accordingly and a member of this magazine's editorial advisory board. • <br /> 16 May 2006 www.greenmediaonline.com <br />