Laserfiche WebLink
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY/SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104 <br /> PART III -EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS <br /> N/A = NOT APPLICABLE 0 = OUTSTANDING A = ABOVE AVERAGE S = SATISFACTORY M = MARGINAL U = UNSATISFACTORY <br /> 15. QUALITY CONTROL N/A 0 A S M U 16. EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT N/A 0 A S M U <br /> a. QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP X a. COOPERATION AND RESPONSIVENESS X <br /> b. ADEQUACY OF THE CQC PLAN X b. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES/ X <br /> c. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CQC X PERSONNEL <br /> PLAN c. COORDINATION AND CONTROL OF X <br /> d. QUALITY OF QC X SUBCONTRACTOR(S) <br /> DOCUMENTATION d. ADEQUACY OF SITE CLEAN-UP X <br /> e. STORAGE OF MATERIALS X e. EFFECTIVENESS OF JOB-SITE X <br /> f. ADEQUACY OF MATERIALS X SUPERVISION <br /> g. ADEQUACY OF SUBMITTALS X 1. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND X <br /> h. ADEQUACY OF QC TESTING X REGULATIONS <br /> i. ADEQUACY OF AS-BUILTS X g. PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT X <br /> j. USE OF SPECIFIED MATERIALS X h. REVIEW/RESOLUTION OF X <br /> k. IDENTIFICATION/CORRECTION OF •X SUBCONTRACTORS ISSUES <br /> DEFICIENT WORK INA TIMELY i. IMPLEMENTATION OF X <br /> MANNER SUBCONTRACTING PLAN <br /> 17.TIMELY PERFORMANCE 18. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR <br /> a. ADEQUACY OF INITIAL PROGRESS X STANDARDS . <br /> SCHEDULE _ a. CORRECTION OF NOTED DEFICIENCIES X _ <br /> b. ADHERENCE TO APPROVED X b. PAYROLLS PROPERLY COMPLETED X <br /> SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTED <br /> c. RESOLUTION OF DELAYS X c. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR LAWS X <br /> d. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED }{ AND REGULATIONS WITH SPECIFIC <br /> DOCUMENTATION ATTENTION TO THE DAVIS-BACON <br /> ACT AND EEO REQUIREMENTS <br /> e. COMPLETION OF PUNCHLIST X 19. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY <br /> ITEMS STANDARDS <br /> f. SUBMISSION OF UPDATED AND X a. ADEQUACY OF SAFETY PLAN X <br /> REVISED PROGRESS SCHEDULES b. IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFETY PLAN X <br /> g.WARRANTY RESPONSE X c. CORRECTION OF NOTED DEFICIENCIES X <br /> 20. REMARKS (Explanation of unsatisfactory evaluation is required. Other comments are optional. Provide facts concerning specific events <br /> or actions to justify the evaluation. These data must be in sufficient detail to assist contracting officers in determining the contractor's <br /> responsibility. Continue on separate sheet(s),if needed.) <br /> EVALUATOR REMARKS: CERES performed debris removal and demolition in southeast Louisiana <br /> in support of Hurricane Katrina recovery. In the midst of this chaotic and dangerous <br /> environment, they worked hundreds of thousands of manhours without a lost time accident. <br /> Their management team responded to this 24 month effort in an outstanding manner. They <br /> proactively worked with both Federal agencies and Local entities. The management of <br /> their 413 first tier subcontractors was both professional and fully supportive of the <br /> requirement of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. <br /> All work was completed timely, disposal sites fully complied with all applicable laws and <br /> regulations and the quality of their work left nothing to be desired. Their overall <br /> management of the project was outstanding. <br /> DD FORM 2626(BACK),JUN 94 <br /> Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. Page 6-26 <br />