CERES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PERFORMANCE SURVEY FORM The Contractor: I. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical I 2 3 4 5 © N/A and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. 2. Demonstrated ability to hire,maintain,and replace,if necessary, 1 2 3 4 0 6 N/A qualified personnel during the contract period. 3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors 1 2 3 4 5 °1 N/A commensurate with contract requirements. 4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. I 2 3 4 5 6 N/A 5. Followed approved quality control plan and conformed to contract 1 2 3 4 5 N/A specifications. 6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 N/A meet contract requirements. 7. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their 1 2 3 4 0 6 N/A quality control procedures. 8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. I 2 3 4 5 6 I/ 9. Identified risks/problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 6 WA 10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. I 2 3 4 5 6 N/A I I. Displayed initiative to solve problems. ] 1 2 3 4 5 O N/A 12. Developed realistic progress schedules. I 2 3 4 5 6 13. Met established project schedules. 1 2 3 4 5D 6 N/A 14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/ 15. I Was responsive to contract changes. I 2 3 4 5 6 (N/A 16. Provided adequate project supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 (6) N/A 17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in- I 2 3 4 5 6 progress increased. 18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. I 2 3 4 5 6 N/A 19. Provided accurate and complete cost proposals including all aspects 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A of work required for each contract change. 20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. I 2 3 I 4 5 6 /A 21. \Vas the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under YES NO N/A the referenced contract?If yes,explain outcome in`remarks". 22. Would you award another contract to this contractor?If not,explain YES NO / in"remarks". N//4 23. Overall Evaluation of Contractor's Performance I 1 1 2 I 3 I 4 011 6 ] REMARKS: CERE. c vd//,'6NiAL /V6-4/ . /D /9AL) cvTSTAN'1)///�/e AS !f SuBCoitiT?/�cT? Fez w/Al c /�.9rv4C5,2,vi dv4/4,� i/�'i= v2•Pil4.cF A/L 1S AND r/En/of/E C/-,EAN�/A 77/Sy rf/ 'M 4Ss/6Aw .SPre/cx ,q,4o9S(1,vhi,44,/.' So•�tt C9,C 77fE HAR0ESTfi%/7^,9, 4.1 19NO //40 GPErvs'ON THE GPDat, ARE4$ r%ti7/.e T//L- CL44/'/' CONC1.uo,D; /R /D/!.U/,,6—=-//f6.wi—�9.vo Sv�o'4vrs'o c l%E/.'E .47)(C5,47/0/14.91..... Z%/Ey a".. _RE A�CuAy�Xe:47/4/114 7 /11.64%/A—ME e. A.POsc G'S4F_ Qe'ic 7'e9 o,✓e. 4,v/.SS!/ f 71/67-6'4'7-64' E U.° "/>E '/9..6 4 Tc fAf /(OF/(Nai-'4 ,416/98GE P/c'oo:ESSiem1/9/.s i; n;AC�aw isio/u'O6 T Tf/'dPB /e/ /17:— Ceres Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. Page 6-28